ArticleForensic science, medicine, and pathology2026
Validation of a direct injection-GC-MS method for the quantification of volatile alcohols in blood and vitreous humor.
Article in Forensic science, medicine, and pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Volatile compounds such as ethanol, methanol, isopropanol, and acetone are frequently encountered in forensic toxicology, particularly in postmortem investigations, poisoning cases, and incidents involving impaired driving. While headspace gas chromatography (HS-GC) remains the gold standard for their analysis, its limited availability in many laboratories highlights the need for more accessible alternatives. This study aimed to develop and validate a direct injection gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (DI-GC-MS) method for the simultaneous quantification of ethanol, methanol, isopropanol, and acetone in human blood and vitreous humor (VH). The method was developed in accordance with the Scientific Working Group for Forensic Toxicology (SWGTOX) guidelines. Analytical standards were prepared in both blood and VH. Method validation included assessment of selectivity, linearity, limits of detection (LOD) and quantification (LOQ), accuracy, precision, recovery, and stability. The DI-GC-MS method demonstrated excellent selectivity and linearity (R² >0.99) for all target analytes. The LODs were 0.01 mg/mL VH and 0.05 mg/mL in blood, while LOQs were 0.05 mg/mL and 0.2 mg/mL, respectively. Accuracy and precision were within acceptable limits. Recoveries exceeded 85% across all tested conditions. The method was successfully applied to 30 real forensic cases. Ethanol was detected in four cases, with blood alcohol concentrations (BAC) ranging from 0.40 to 2.30 mg/mL. The validated DI-GC-MS method provides a reliable, sensitive, cost-effective, and reproducible alternative to HS-GC for the quantification of volatile alcohols in postmortem blood and VH. It is particularly well-suited for forensic laboratories with limited access to specialized instrumentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41160356What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.