ArticleBiomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology2025
Nonlinear anisotropic constitutive description of the human basilic vein and comparison with the vein of the lower limb.
Article in Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The number of patients undergoing hemodialysis has been steadily increasing in recent decades. Arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is the gold standard for ensuring vascular access in these patients. Despite the prominent role of AVFs in hemodialysis treatment, their maturation and long-term functionality continue to pose challenges as less than a third of fistulas remain patent without further interventions in a 3-year follow-up. Computational biomechanics has become an essential tool for clarifying mechanical conditions accompanying the pathogenesis of various vascular complications, including suboptimal maturation and AVF stenosis. Constitutive description plays a crucial role in the design of computational models and without it simulations remain only at the rigid tube level. However, literature on the mechanical properties and constitutive modeling of upper extremity veins is lacking. This study aims to fill this gap by characterizing the mechanical properties of the human basilic vein (BV) and comparing it to the great saphenous vein (GSV). Uniaxial tensile tests in two perpendicular directions were used to obtain the mechanical response of the tissue. The results suggest that BVs do not significantly differ from GSVs in their elastic properties expressed by means of the tangent modulus. Overall anisotropy, understood as the difference in elastic moduli obtained in different directions, seems to be reduced in BVs. The 4-fiber family exponential model of the strain energy density function was adopted to fit the experimental data. The model fitted the data well, as suggested by the coefficients of determination R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.