ReviewVeterinary research communications2025
The domestic cat microbiome: mapping knowledge gaps through scientometric analysis in feline microbial research.
Review in Veterinary research communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, we present the first comprehensive scientometric analysis of research on the domestic cat microbiome, providing a transparent and data-driven overview of the field. We examined 282 publications on the microbiome of domestic cats (Felis catus) to uncover dominant research themes, methodological patterns, microbial niches, and knowledge gaps. Our results reveal a sharp rise in publications since 2012, with a peak in 2024, where most work is concentrated in high-income countries and driven by a small number of academic institutions. Current efforts are heavily focused on the bacterial gut microbiome, typically using genomic tools for taxonomic profiling in comparative designs. In contrast, research on other microbial communities (e.g., oral or skin), non-bacterial taxa, functional analyses, and behavioural outcomes remains scarce, with behavioural studies virtually absent. Although some studies report health-related effects, mainly positive or neutral, the functional roles of the microbiota and their possible influence on feline behaviour remain largely unexplored. By mapping these trends and gaps, our study provides a strategic framework for advancing microbiome research in domestic cats. These findings highlight priority areas and methodological opportunities that can guide future investigations, foster interdisciplinary collaboration, and ultimately deepen our understanding of the intricate links between microbial ecology, feline health, and behaviour. Studies connecting the microbiome with feline diseases, behaviour, and diet are strongly encouraged, given their high applicability to everyday animal care and management. Such research has the potential to improve both feline health and welfare, while also strengthening the human-cat bond.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41160321What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.