Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41160321›Full record

ReviewVeterinary research communications2025

The domestic cat microbiome: mapping knowledge gaps through scientometric analysis in feline microbial research.

Cristiano Schetini de Azevedo, Ivana Gabriela Schork, Luiza Figueiredo Passos, Ian Goodhead, Robert John Young

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Veterinary research communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Cristiano Schetini de AzevedoDepartamento de Evolução, Biodiversidade e Meio Ambiente, Instituto de Ciências Exatas e Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto, Minas Gerais, Campus Morro do Cruzeiro, s/n, Bauxita, Ouro Preto, 35400-000, Brasil. cristiano.azevedo@ufop.edu.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0256-9017
Ivana Gabriela SchorkDepartment of Animal and Agriculture, Hartpury University, Gloucester, GL19 3BE, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1300-7602
Luiza Figueiredo PassosSchool of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, James Parsons Building, L3 3AF, Liverpool, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4529-9950
Ian GoodheadUniversity of Salford Manchester, Peel Building - Room G51, Salford, M5 4WT, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3110-9442
Robert John YoungUniversity of Salford Manchester, Peel Building - Room G51, Salford, M5 4WT, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8407-2348

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we present the first comprehensive scientometric analysis of research on the domestic cat microbiome, providing a transparent and data-driven overview of the field. We examined 282 publications on the microbiome of domestic cats (Felis catus) to uncover dominant research themes, methodological patterns, microbial niches, and knowledge gaps. Our results reveal a sharp rise in publications since 2012, with a peak in 2024, where most work is concentrated in high-income countries and driven by a small number of academic institutions. Current efforts are heavily focused on the bacterial gut microbiome, typically using genomic tools for taxonomic profiling in comparative designs. In contrast, research on other microbial communities (e.g., oral or skin), non-bacterial taxa, functional analyses, and behavioural outcomes remains scarce, with behavioural studies virtually absent. Although some studies report health-related effects, mainly positive or neutral, the functional roles of the microbiota and their possible influence on feline behaviour remain largely unexplored. By mapping these trends and gaps, our study provides a strategic framework for advancing microbiome research in domestic cats. These findings highlight priority areas and methodological opportunities that can guide future investigations, foster interdisciplinary collaboration, and ultimately deepen our understanding of the intricate links between microbial ecology, feline health, and behaviour. Studies connecting the microbiome with feline diseases, behaviour, and diet are strongly encouraged, given their high applicability to everyday animal care and management. Such research has the potential to improve both feline health and welfare, while also strengthening the human-cat bond.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeMicrobiotaAnimalsCatsBibliometric analysisCompanion animalsDomestic catsFeline healthMicrobiome

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.