ReviewJournal of neuro-oncology2025
The activity of cold atmospheric plasma against high-grade glioma: a review.
Review in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A dual-index framework for cold atmospheric plasma dosing: A meta-analysis of parametric control from volumetric redox flux to redox homeostatic status.Redox biology · 2026Pooled it
- Evolving Landscape of Glioblastoma Research: Integrating Therapeutic Advances and Diagnostic Frontiers.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- Plasma-Nanomedicine Synergistic Therapy for Brain Diseases: Current Status, Applications, and Challenges.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCold atmospheric plasma (CAP), a partially ionized near-room temperature gas (argon or helium), generates a variety of oxygen and nitrogen reactive species which can have a multitude of downstream biological effects including cell death, inflammation, and immune modulation. CAP is therefore a powerful tool with many potential medical applications, particularly in cancer treatment. As primary treatment, CAP can be administered directly through a plasma jet, or indirectly via plasma activated substances (i.e. media, biogels, etc.). CAP has been shown to directly kill cancer cells by inducing RONS-mediated cell death mechanisms, enhance anti-tumor immunity or increase the tumor's responsiveness to systemic therapies. While the chemical factors (i.e. RONS-mediated apoptosis) is the most studied mechanism of CAP efficacy, CAP can also induce necrosis of cells through ultraviolet irradiation, thermal and electromagnetic effects, which tend to lead to necrosis. CAP has been shown to cause selective cell death in various cancers, including skin, breast, colorectal, head and neck, and more recently in gliomas, with minimal side effects to surrounding normal tissues.
conclusionWe summarize the studies investigating CAP applications in neuro-oncology to date, including in vitro and pre-clinical studies, followed by a brief mention of ongoing clinical trials for CAP as a cancer treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41160270What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.