ArticleWorld journal of urology2025
Large language model chatbots for patient education in kidney stones: a scoping review.
Article in World journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in Urologic Documentation: A Review of Emerging Capabilities and the Ongoing Need for Human Oversight.Current urology reports · 2026Review
- Evaluation of large language model-generated information in diabetes health patient education: a scoping review.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Large language models for late-life depression: a blinded benchmark of clinical safety, geriatric appropriateness, and triage.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeIn 2024, 17% of adults reported using an artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot at least once a month as a source of health information, rising to 25% among those under 30. We aim to conduct a scoping review of the existing literature assessing the performance of large language model (LLM) chatbots for patient education in kidney stone disease (KSD).
methodsThe Joanna Briggs Institute methodology was followed. Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Google Scholar were searched for studies in all languages, from 2015 up to February 16th 2025, evaluating LLM chatbots to create educational content on KSD. Two independent reviewers completed screening, full-text review, and data extraction, with conflicts resolved by a third reviewer.
resultsOf the 281 search results, 17 were included. Five of six studies assessing readability found that LLM responses exceeded the recommended 6th-8th grade reading level, though effective prompting can help meet this target. Six out of eight studies reported adequate to very good accuracy performance, with two showing comparable performance to traditional information sources. Understandability and actionability performance was poor. Quality performance was variable across seven studies. Three studies assessed patients' perception, revealing a mixed but generally favorable experience. Two studies noted notable deviations from established clinical guidelines.
conclusionLLM chatbots show potential for KSD patient education and physician workload reduction, but currently have limitations in readability, guideline adherence, understandability, and actionability. This could be mitigated by prompting and the development of urology-specific tools trained on validated content and evaluated with patient involvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41160267What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.