Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41160244›Full record

ReviewCurrent reviews in musculoskeletal medicine2025

Looking Under the Hood: Screening for Cardiac Abnormalities in Young Athletes.

David M Siebert, Kimberly G Harmon

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

David M SiebertDepartment of Family Medicine and Center for Sports Cardiology, University of Washington, 3800 Montlake Blvd NE, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA. siebert@uw.edu.
Kimberly G HarmonDepartment of Family Medicine and Center for Sports Cardiology, University of Washington, 3800 Montlake Blvd NE, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewSudden cardiac arrest (SCA) in a young athlete is a profoundly impactful and potentially tragic event. This review summarizes the epidemiology of SCA in athletes, evolving methods of carrying out the cardiac preparticipation evaluation (cPPE), and the appropriate identification and follow up care of athletes with positive cPPE screens. It also guides clinicians on decision making after a positive cPPE screen, provides an overview of shared decision-making following a new cardiac diagnosis, and emphasizes the importance of the emergency action plan (EAP). RECENT

findingsSCA is more common than historical estimates, and survival rates may be improving. cPPE strategies based on the history and physical exam alone have significant limitations. The resting electrocardiogram (ECG) is endorsed as an important component of the cPPE by some societies and leagues and is the most statistically powerful tool to achieve the goal of early detection of cardiac conditions. A comprehensive evaluation, inclusive of expert consultation and shared decision making, is recommended to determine participation status following a new cardiac diagnosis. Long-term follow up studies suggest athletic competition with a known cardiac diagnosis may be safe in some cases. The optimal method of conducting the cPPE remains an area of intense debate. Regardless of method utilized, sports medicine clinicians should be able to accurately identify a positive screen based and understand the appropriate next steps based on modern ECG interpretation criteria and expert guidelines. No screening method is perfect, and the EAP will always remain a critical component of any safe athletic venture.

Indexed as

Athlete electrocardiogram (ECG)Emergency Action PlanPreparticipation evaluationShared decision-makingSports cardiologySudden cardiac arrest

Identifiers

PMID41160244
PMCPMC12572454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.