Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41160174›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2025

Development and validation of a predictive model for adherent perirenal fat based on CT radiomics and deep learning.

Xiaobo Ding, Hongcheng Liu, Xu Li, Dayong Jin, Mingshuang Lu, Suyan Tian, Mingyang Li, Li Liu, Huimao Zhang, Erick M Remer and 2 more

Abstract readValidation StudyMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Xiaobo Ding *Department of Radiology, First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, China.
Hongcheng Liu *Department of Urology, First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, China.
Xu LiDepartment of Urology, First Hospital of Siping City, Siping, 136099, China.
Dayong JinDepartment of Urology, Central Hospital of Liaoyuan City, Liaoyuan, 136200, China.
Mingshuang LuDepartment of Urology, People's Hospital of Dongfeng County, Dongfeng, 136399, Jilin, China.
Suyan TianDepartment of Clinical Research, First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, China.
Mingyang LiDepartment of Radiology, First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, China.
Li LiuDepartment of Urology, First Hospital of Siping City, Siping, 136099, China.
Huimao ZhangDepartment of Radiology, First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, China.
Erick M RemerImaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, 44195, USA.
Riccardo BertoloUrology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata (AOUI) Verona, University of Verona, Verona, 37126, Italy.
Yanbo WangDepartment of Urology, First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, China. wangyanb@jlu.edu.cn.

Funding

Wu Jieping Medical Foundation Grant No. 320.6750.2023-11-17
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe study aimed to develop and validate a predictive model for preoperative APF using computed tomography (CT) radiomics combined with deep learning, and validating the performance of the model in an independent cohort.

methodsThe APF was defined as the need for a renal subcapsular dissection to separate the renal tumor for surgical procedures. This multicenter study collected data from renal tumor patients managed at tertiary institutions. The dataset was randomly split into a cross-validation group (70%) and an in-house test set (30%). Additionally, prospective data from three other tertiary hospitals were used as an external test set. A 3D-UNet deep learning model was employed for kidney segmentation. Intra-observer and inter-observer reproducibility was evaluated using the Dice similarity coefficient. Logistic regression models discriminated between APF and non-APF.

resultsThis study enrolled a total of 460 patients, with 291 in the cross-validation set, 126 in the internal testing set, and 43 in the external testing set. The Dice similarity coefficients for both intra-observer and inter-observer assessments exceeded 0.80. Twenty-eight radiomics features and three clinical features were selected for modeling. The optimal model achieved an area under the curve of 0.95 (95% CI, 0.94-0.97) in the training set, 0.95 (95% CI, 0.92-0.97) in the validation set,0.872 (95% CI, 0.807-0.937) in the internal test set, and 0.805 (95% CI,0.676-0.935) in the external test set.

conclusionCT radiomics combined with deep learning shows promise in predicting APF in surgical candidates affected with renal neoplasms.

Indexed as

Adipose TissueDeep LearningKidneyKidney NeoplasmsTomography, X-Ray ComputedAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesRadiomicsReproducibility of ResultsAdherent perirenal fatDeep learningRadiomics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.