ReviewHerzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie2026
[What to do with device-detected atrial fibrillation? : Executive summary of the position paper of the German Society of Cardiology].
Review in Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Device-detected atrial fibrillation (DDAF), like clinical atrial fibrillation (AF), is also associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic events, although the risk appears to be significantly lower. The efficacy and safety of oral anticoagulation in DDAF were investigated in two large randomized trials (NOAH-AFNET 6 and ARTESIA [13, 19]). They showed a low rate of ischemic strokes without anticoagulation (about 1% per year). This risk can still be reduced by therapeutic anticoagulation, but the risk of severe bleeding increases. In the recently published position paper [36] of the German Society of Cardiology, the current study situation was presented and expert recommendations were given on how to deal with DDAF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.