SynthesisLangenbeck's archives of surgery2025
Risk factors for stoma outlet obstruction: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionStoma outlet obstruction (SOO) is a serious postoperative complication that can lead to significant morbidity, including prolonged hospitalization, increased healthcare costs, and reduced quality of life. This study, the first systematic review and meta-analysis on SOO, aims to identify and analyze key risk factors of SOO, calculate its pooled incidence, and systematically review its diagnostic features, clinical symptoms, imaging modalities, management strategies, prognosis, and associated outcomes.
methodsThis systematic review and meta-analysis followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines and included 16 retrospective cohort studies, identified through a comprehensive search of multiple databases, with data on risk factors for SOO. The study analyzed four key variables reported by three or more studies, assessed study quality using the MASTER scale, and synthesized findings using the quality effects model to evaluate heterogeneity and publication bias.
resultsThis study included 16 retrospective cohort studies involving 2,228 patients, of whom 362 developed SOO. Increased rectus abdominis muscle thickness was found to significantly increase the risk of SOO (odds ratio [OR] 4.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.36-6.93). High output stoma was another associated risk factor (OR 4.16, 95% CI 2.03-8.51). The type of ileostomy also played a critical role, with loop ileostomy showing a significantly higher risk of SOO compared to end ileostomy (OR 6.53, 95% CI 2.83-15.03). Although age was assessed as a potential risk factor, it did not show a statistically significant association with SOO (OR 1.69, 95% CI 0.44-6.54).
conclusionThis systematic review and meta-analysis identified significant risk factors for SOO, including increased rectus abdominis muscle thickness, high output stoma, loop ileostomy. We also reported other contributing factors, such as ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, shorter ileal pouch-to-ileostomy distance, oral inferior technique, smaller aperture size, higher BMI, and increased subcutaneous fat thickness. The findings emphasize the importance of tailored surgical techniques, such as stoma maturation using the oral superior technique, ensuring no twist at the mesentery, avoiding stoma limb angulation, creating the stoma slightly more proximally in cases of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, and optimizing aperture size, along with vigilant postoperative care to reduce SOO incidence and improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.