Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41160154›Full record

ArticleAnimal cognition2025

Foraging competence and its impact on social relationships in a socially tolerant wild primate.

Elif Karakoç, Richard Vogg, Michele Marziliano, Jacob von Petersdorff, Alexander S Ecker, Peter M Kappeler, Claudia Fichtel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal cognition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Elif KarakoçDepartment of Sociobiology/Anthropology, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-6196-8847
Richard VoggBehavioral Ecology & Sociobiology Unit, German Primate Center, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9079-2715
Michele MarzilianoBehavioral Ecology & Sociobiology Unit, German Primate Center, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4975-2137
Jacob von PetersdorffBehavioral Ecology & Sociobiology Unit, German Primate Center, Göttingen, Germany.
Alexander S EckerInstitute of Computer Science and Campus Institute Data Science, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2392-5105
Peter M KappelerBehavioral Ecology & Sociobiology Unit, German Primate Center, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4801-487X
Claudia FichtelBehavioral Ecology & Sociobiology Unit, German Primate Center, Göttingen, Germany. Claudia.fichtel@gwdg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8346-2168

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft GRK2906 - project number 502807174
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social interactions are crucial for individual health and ultimately fitness, making the choice of social partners evolutionarily relevant. Previous research has shown that individuals who succeed in foraging tasks often receive increased affiliation from group members. Similarly, in a social learning context, individuals who possess valuable information become more attractive social partners. Thus, an individual's role in a foraging context, specifically, whether it is a successful producer, can influence its social relationships. To explore this effect, we examined the interplay between social learning, producing and scrounging behavior, and social relationships in four groups of wild red-fronted lemurs (Eulemur rufifrons; N = 29). We conducted an open diffusion experiment with food boxes that required animals to learn one of two techniques to open them. 16 individuals learned to open them. Initial success was better predicted by use of individual than social information, i.e., manipulating the food boxes vs. time spent watching successful individuals or scrounging. Older males were less successful than females. Scrounging occurred in about 26% of events. The technique used, age and sex of the producer did not predict the number of scroungers. Less successful individuals and males scrounged more often. Successful individuals received more affiliative behavior during the experimental period than in the pre-experimental period, which returned to baseline levels during the post-experimental period. Thus, red-fronted lemurs recognize and reward competent foraging partners socially during periods where they can benefit from them immediately. Together, these results highlight the importance of foraging competence for social integration and partner choice.

Indexed as

Feeding BehaviorLemurSocial BehaviorSocial LearningAnimalsFemaleMalePrimatesRed-fronted lemursScrounger producer dynamicsSocial learningSocial relationships

Identifiers

PMID41160154
PMCPMC12572059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.