ArticleEuropean journal of nutrition2025
Novel approach to substantiate cause-and-effect relationships: combining study ranking and statistical modelling, with a crucial role of data sharing.
Article in European journal of nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe present study aims at substantiation of cause-and-effect relationships via a combination of ranking studies and statistical modelling of the highest scoring studies.
methodsDue to the fact that independent datasets of studies identified in the ranking part of the study were difficult to obtain the second part was performed using a different aim. The ranking part concentrated around studies on the association between vitamin D status and severity (morbidity/mortality) of COVID-19 infection in hospitalized patients with criteria focussing on physiological and statistical relevance. The topic of the second part of our study changed into the impact of postbiotic consumption on infectious episodes in children to accommodate testing the statistical modelling approach. The latter consisted of the construction of a multivariate confounding model based on the data of one study and subsequent validation of the achieved model via data of an independent study with a similar experimental design. Sensitivity and specificity were assessed in both studies applying discriminant analysis.
resultsThe first part of our project consisted of five statistically-based criteria to rank the various studies resulting in the highest score obtained by Hernandez et al. (J Clin Endocrinol Metab 106, e1343-e1353. 10.1210/clinem/dgaa733, 2021). Subsequently, the second part using the datasets of the postbiotic studies yielded a significant model showing impact by consumption of the postbiotic on the reduction of infectious episodes. The sensitivity and specificity outcome ranged between 68 to 94%. Importantly changing the datasets did not affect the significant impact of the postbiotic.
conclusionThe combination of a ranking and a statistical modelling approach supports the validation of causal-effect relationships via objective criteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41160153What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.