Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41160116›Full record

Trial reportIntensive care medicine2025

Dexmedetomidine for treatment of hyperactive delirium in non-intubated ICU patients: the 4D randomized clinical trial.

Thomas Godet, Clémence Louis, Benjamin Rieu, Audrey De Jong, Pierre Couhault, Gaël Pradel, Hugo Tête, Nathalie Bourguignon, Lucile Borao, Matthieu Jabaudon and 6 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Intensive care medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03317067 (Effects of Dexmedetomidine on Delirium Duration of Non-intubated ICU Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03317067 phase3completednot on this map

Effects of Dexmedetomidine on Delirium Duration of Non-intubated ICU Patients (4D Trial)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, Clermont-FerrandRan2017 to 2023Enrolled168ConditionsDelirium, AgitationArmsDexmedetomidine, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Thomas GodetDépartement Anesthésie Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Clermont-Ferrand, Pôle de Médecine Péri-Opératoire, Clermont-Ferrand, France. tgodet@chu-clermontferrand.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-9667-3407
Clémence LouisCentre Hospitalier de Moulins Yzeure, Service d'Anesthésie, Moulins, France.
Benjamin RieuDépartement Anesthésie Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Clermont-Ferrand, Pôle de Médecine Péri-Opératoire, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Audrey De JongDépartement Anesthésie Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Montpellier, Hôpital Saint Eloi, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3413-2752
Pierre CouhaultDépartement Anesthésie Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Clermont-Ferrand, Pôle de Médecine Péri-Opératoire, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Gaël PradelService de Réanimation Polyvalente, Centre Hospitalier d'Aurillac, Aurillac, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2027-6218
Hugo TêteDépartement Anesthésie Réanimation, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France.
Nathalie BourguignonDélégation À La Recherche Clinique Et À L'Innovation (DRCI), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Lucile BoraoDépartement Anesthésie Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Clermont-Ferrand, Pôle de Médecine Péri-Opératoire, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Matthieu JabaudonDépartement Anesthésie Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Clermont-Ferrand, Pôle de Médecine Péri-Opératoire, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Emmanuel FutierDépartement Anesthésie Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Clermont-Ferrand, Pôle de Médecine Péri-Opératoire, Clermont-Ferrand, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6454-271X
Samir JaberDépartement Anesthésie Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Montpellier, Hôpital Saint Eloi, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7257-8069
Bruno PereiraDélégation À La Recherche Clinique Et À L'Innovation (DRCI), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3778-7161
Gérald ChanquesDépartement Anesthésie Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Montpellier, Hôpital Saint Eloi, Montpellier, France.
Jean-Michel ConstantinDépartement Anesthésie Réanimation, Hôpital La Pitié-Salpêtrière, DMU DREAM, Sorbonne Université, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7634-5898
4D study group

Funding

PHRCI 2018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWhether dexmedetomidine improves the control of hyperactive delirium in non-intubated intensive care unit (ICU) patients as compared with placebo remains uncertain.

methodsIn a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-arm, investigator-initiated, randomized trial conducted in 9 ICUs, we randomly assigned non-intubated critically ill adults with hyperactive delirium to receive continuous intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine or placebo for at least 36 h. The primary outcome was a joint modelling of multiple outcomes of agitation duration (score of + 1 or higher on the Richmond agitation-sedation scale), delirium duration, or the need for intubation and deep sedation. Key secondary outcomes included the occurrence of complications (such as bradycardia or hypotension), length of stay in ICU, or death.

resultsEnrollment occurred from December 2017 to February 2022. Final follow-up was in February 2023. The study was stopped for efficacy at the time of the preplanned interim analysis. Among the 151 patients who were included in the final analysis, the between-group difference in the primary outcome was statistically significant (median difference, -30 points; 95% CI, - 49 to - 12, p = 0.001). Agitation duration was shorter in the dexmedetomidine group (1.0 (1.0-2.0) vs 2.0 (1.0-7.0) hours, absolute difference 95% CI - 1.0 (- 2.0 to - 0.1); ES, - 0.60; 95% CI, -0.92 to -0.27, p = 0.001). Other key secondary outcomes were similar between groups.

conclusionIn non-intubated adult ICU patients with hyperactive delirium, the use of dexmedetomidine was associated with a greater clinical benefit than placebo for the joint modelling of multiple endpoints of agitation control, delirium resolution, and intubation with mechanical ventilation. Dexmedetomidine appears to be a valuable alternative that significantly reduced the median duration of agitation by approximately 1 h compared to placebo in hyperactive delirious non-intubated intensive care unit patients.

trial registrationClinicalTrial.gov Identifier: NCT03317067. Registration on October 17th, 2017 prior to first patient inclusion. https://clinicaltrials.gov/search?term=NCT03317067 .

Indexed as

DeliriumDexmedetomidineHypnotics and SedativesPsychomotor AgitationAdultAgedCritical IllnessDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeDexmedetomidineHypnotics and SedativesAgitationDeliriumDexmedetomidineICUIntubationSedation

Identifiers

PMID41160116
PMCPMC12678554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.