Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41160108›Full record

ReviewVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2026

Differential diagnosis and predictive markers of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (PanNET).

Matthieu Tihy, Agathe Hercent, Jérôme Cros, Anne Couvelard

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Matthieu TihyDepartment of Pathology, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Beaujon-Bichat Hospitals, AP-HP, Paris, France. matthieu.tihy@aphp.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9314-4657
Agathe HercentUniversité Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Jérôme CrosDepartment of Pathology, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Beaujon-Bichat Hospitals, AP-HP, Paris, France.
Anne CouvelardDepartment of Pathology, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Beaujon-Bichat Hospitals, AP-HP, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (PanNETs) are well-differentiated neoplasms that present with a variable clinical picture and prognosis. This makes accurate classification essential for guiding treatment and assessing outcomes. The current WHO classification system categorises PanNETs according to their proliferative activity. A morphological assessment combined with immunohistochemistry is central to the diagnosis, as it confirms neuroendocrine differentiation and rules out differential diagnoses. Nevertheless, panels targeting neuroendocrine and lineage-specific markers can enhance diagnostic confidence. Both histological and molecular predictive biomarkers are playing an increasingly significant role in tumour classification, prognosis and therapeutic decision-making. This review highlights the current morphological and immunohistochemical criteria for PanNET diagnosis and emphasises the growing importance of predictive biomarkers.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorNeuroendocrine TumorsPancreatic NeoplasmsDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansImmunohistochemistryPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorKi-67PanNETTumours

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.