Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41160026›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

Health-Related Social Needs Among LGB+ Veterans.

Shane Lamba, David A Frank, Jennifer L McCoy, Soumik Purkayastha, Sarah M Leder, Lauren E Russell, Joshua H Gordon, Gregory T Procario, Ernest M Moy, Leslie R M Hausmann

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Shane LambaOffice of Health Equity, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, DC.
David A FrankCenter for Healthcare Evaluation, Research, and Promotion (CHERP), Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Jennifer L McCoyCenter for Healthcare Evaluation, Research, and Promotion (CHERP), Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Soumik PurkayasthaCenter for Healthcare Evaluation, Research, and Promotion (CHERP), Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Sarah M LederOffice of Health Equity, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, DC.
Lauren E RussellOffice of Health Equity, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, DC.
Joshua H GordonMental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center (MIRECC), Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Gregory T ProcarioCenter for Healthcare Evaluation, Research, and Promotion (CHERP), Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Ernest M MoyOffice of Health Equity, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, DC.
Leslie R M HausmannCenter for Healthcare Evaluation, Research, and Promotion (CHERP), Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Veterans identifying as lesbian, gay, bisexual, additional orientations, or not sure (LGB+) may have unique health-related social needs. By addressing social needs, health systems can take steps to alleviate persistent health disparities in this population. Objective: To evaluate associations between sexual orientation and need for support for social needs among primary care patients served by the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used data from a national sample of VHA primary care patients seen in January or February 2023 who were invited to participate in a survey online or by mail. Data collection occurred from March 2 through May 9, 2023. Exposure: Self-reported sexual orientation (straight or LGB+). Main Outcomes and Measures: Unadjusted prevalence ratios (PRs) and adjusted PRs (APRs) of need for support across 13 health-related social domains. Results: Of 38 759 veterans invited to participate in the survey, 7095 (18.3%) responded and 6296 (16.2%) with complete data were included. Weighted responses represented 903 714 veterans. The unweighted number (weighted percentage) identifying as straight was 5874 (94.2%) and as LGB+ was 422 (5.8%); 3585 (89.1%) were male. In unadjusted comparisons, LGB+ veterans had a higher prevalence of need for support for feeling socially isolated (PR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.04-1.87), feeling lonely (PR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.20-2.09), finding or keeping work (PR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.07-2.75), paying for food (PR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.19-2.46), paying for basics such as housing, medical care, and heating (PR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.29-2.75), managing experiences of discrimination (PR, 2.31; 95% CI, 1.54-3.48), and getting or maintaining housing (PR, 2.41; 95% CI, 1.40-4.15). After adjusting for age and for a combined race, ethnicity, and sex variable, LGB+ veterans had higher prevalence of need for support for managing experiences of discrimination (APR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.21-2.64) and getting or maintaining housing (APR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.10-3.34). Conclusions and Relevance: This cross-sectional study found that LGB+ veterans reported a higher prevalence of social needs related to managing experiences of discrimination and housing instability compared with their straight counterparts. Expansion of support systems to address social needs in general and to ensure that systems are tailored for groups that more often experience certain needs should be considered.

Indexed as

Sexual and Gender MinoritiesSocial Determinants of HealthSocial SupportVeteransAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesHealth InequitiesHousing InstabilityHumansLonelinessMiddle AgedPrimary Health CareSocial IsolationSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID41160026
PMCPMC12573039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.