ArticleJAMA network open2025
Health-Related Social Needs Among LGB+ Veterans.
Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Veterans identifying as lesbian, gay, bisexual, additional orientations, or not sure (LGB+) may have unique health-related social needs. By addressing social needs, health systems can take steps to alleviate persistent health disparities in this population. Objective: To evaluate associations between sexual orientation and need for support for social needs among primary care patients served by the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used data from a national sample of VHA primary care patients seen in January or February 2023 who were invited to participate in a survey online or by mail. Data collection occurred from March 2 through May 9, 2023. Exposure: Self-reported sexual orientation (straight or LGB+). Main Outcomes and Measures: Unadjusted prevalence ratios (PRs) and adjusted PRs (APRs) of need for support across 13 health-related social domains. Results: Of 38 759 veterans invited to participate in the survey, 7095 (18.3%) responded and 6296 (16.2%) with complete data were included. Weighted responses represented 903 714 veterans. The unweighted number (weighted percentage) identifying as straight was 5874 (94.2%) and as LGB+ was 422 (5.8%); 3585 (89.1%) were male. In unadjusted comparisons, LGB+ veterans had a higher prevalence of need for support for feeling socially isolated (PR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.04-1.87), feeling lonely (PR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.20-2.09), finding or keeping work (PR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.07-2.75), paying for food (PR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.19-2.46), paying for basics such as housing, medical care, and heating (PR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.29-2.75), managing experiences of discrimination (PR, 2.31; 95% CI, 1.54-3.48), and getting or maintaining housing (PR, 2.41; 95% CI, 1.40-4.15). After adjusting for age and for a combined race, ethnicity, and sex variable, LGB+ veterans had higher prevalence of need for support for managing experiences of discrimination (APR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.21-2.64) and getting or maintaining housing (APR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.10-3.34). Conclusions and Relevance: This cross-sectional study found that LGB+ veterans reported a higher prevalence of social needs related to managing experiences of discrimination and housing instability compared with their straight counterparts. Expansion of support systems to address social needs in general and to ensure that systems are tailored for groups that more often experience certain needs should be considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.