ReviewEpilepsia2026
Lennox-Gastaut syndrome unveiled: Advancing diagnosis, therapies, and advocacy-insights from the Genoa International Workshop.
Review in Epilepsia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Adjunctive Fenfluramine in Adults with Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome: Effectiveness and Tolerability in Real-World Clinical Practice.CNS drugs · 2026Article
- Unraveling Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome: From Molecular Pathogenesis to Precision Diagnosis and Targeted Therapy Evolving Therapeutic Strategies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
41 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) is one of the most severe, yet one of the most discussed, childhood-onset developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (DEEs). Dissent among epileptologists on the definition and minimum set of electroclinical features derives from the high etiological heterogeneity within the syndrome, which could make its prevalence overestimated. However, in recent years, our diagnostic strategies, including both high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging and next-generation sequencing techniques, have enabled us to disentangle many cases previously classified as "idiopathic." In addition, some electroencephalographic and circulating biomarkers have been identified that could predict disease progression and treatment response if confirmed in larger patient populations. As our diagnostic capacity increases, so do our treatment strategies. Although progress has been made, the implementation of better clinical trial designs, individualized treatments, and therapies that address the genetic roots of the disease remains necessary in clinical practice. A lot is being done in this direction, thanks to the involvement of families and the creation of international networks, such as the ERNs, which are rapidly promoting collaboration among highly specialized centers and the establishment of disease registries to shed light on the natural history of LGS. Yet, many unmet needs still afflict patients and their families, including uncertainties arising from the transition process and a lack of administrative support and comprehensive care as patients transition into adulthood. This article summarizes these key challenges in diagnosing, treating, and caring for patients with LGS, as well as the roadmap to enhanced future care discussed during the international LGS meeting held in Genoa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.