Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41159710›Full record

ArticleNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2026

Cigarette Smoke Extract and Nicotine Evoke Similar Interoceptive Effects in a Pavlovian Occasion Setting Task in Male and Female Sprague-Dawley Rats.

Anita Sikic, Davin R Peart, Mckenna A Williams, Avery R Cameron, Jessica M Karlovcec, Brandon W Florek, Jude A Frie, Jibran Y Khokhar, Rick A Bevins, Jennifer E Murray

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Anita SikicDepartment of Psychology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.
Davin R PeartDepartment of Psychology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.
Mckenna A WilliamsDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.
Avery R CameronDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Guelph, ON, Canada.
Jessica M KarlovcecDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.
Brandon W FlorekDepartment of Psychology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.
Jude A FrieCollaborative Neurosciences Graduate Program, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.
Jibran Y KhokharDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada.
Rick A BevinsDepartment of Psychology, University of Nebraska - Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, United States.
Jennifer E MurrayDepartment of Psychology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8992-7317

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAlthough nicotine is the primary component of interest in tobacco, the other ~9500 constituents in tobacco are thought to interact with nicotine to contribute to the pharmacological effects relevant to tobacco use disorder. These other tobacco constituents may also contribute to providing an interoceptive stimulus unique from that of nicotine alone. Using a Pavlovian drug discrimination task, we assessed whether rats could discriminate between nicotine and cigarette smoke extract (CSE) of the same nicotine concentration (0.2 mg/kg) based on the presence of constituent chemicals.

methodsRats were assigned to one of three training conditions in which intermixed daily injections were administered before chamber placement. The interoceptive stimulus elicited by the injected compound would set the occasion on which a light conditioned stimulus would, or would not, be followed by sucrose. Increased dipper entries during the conditioned stimulus indicate greater anticipation of impending sucrose. Groups included (1) nicotine versus vehicle with nicotine signaling sucrose, (2) CSE versus vehicle with CSE signaling sucrose, and (3) CSE versus nicotine with CSE signaling sucrose. This final group determined whether rats could discriminate based on other tobacco constituents.

resultsSubjects readily discriminated between nicotine and vehicle and between CSE and vehicle within ~20 training sessions; however, they were unable to discriminate between CSE and nicotine after 72 sessions.

conclusionsOur results confirm that CSE is a successful Pavlovian discriminative stimulus and add to previous nicotine literature. Interestingly, we demonstrate that CSE and nicotine do not create distinct interoceptive environments under current training conditions. IMPLICATIONS: Nicotine has long been used as a proxy for tobacco in non-human animal studies. However, there has always been an undercurrent regarding the appropriateness of this approach given the myriad constituents in tobacco. Though generalization to other behavioral preparations must be done with extreme caution, the current findings suggest that, at least in some capacity, there is overlap in the stimulus characteristics of nicotine and CSE.

Indexed as

Conditioning, ClassicalInteroceptionNicotineSmokeAnimalsFemaleMaleRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyTobacco ProductsNicotineSmoke

Identifiers

PMID41159710
PMCPMC13101993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.