ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2026
Interpretable machine learning for identifying ICU readmission risk in subgroups with probabilistic rules.
Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveEstimating readmission risk for intensive care unit (ICU) patients is critical for clinicians to optimize resource allocation and prevent premature discharges. Machine learning models currently applied to this task either lack interpretability or cannot identify patient subgroups with distinctive readmission risks and characteristics. We addressed this gap by introducing a cutting-edge rule-based model, namely truly unordered rule sets (TURS), to reveal heterogeneous readmission risks and subgroup-level patient characteristics. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe trained TURS on all ICU admissions from January 2011 to January 2020 at Leiden University Medical Center. For each subgroup, patient characteristics and the influence of feature variables on readmission risk were analyzed.
resultsTURS identified subgroups with heterogeneous feature distributions and feature importance, providing actionable insights for ICU discharge planning. Its predictive performance (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [ROC-AUC] 70.5%) and model complexity (5 rules, average length 2) surpassed other rule-based models. DISCUSSION: Subgroup analysis highlighted the heterogeneity of patients. First, we compared the conditional probability distribution of each feature variable, conditioned on the fact that a patient was in a certain subgroup, with its unconditional distribution. We identified features deviating from the unconditional distribution, illustrating unique subgroup-specific implications. Furthermore, we demonstrated that features with the highest impact on the readmission risk were distinctive for each subgroup.
conclusionThe TURS model provided a concise summary of patient subgroups, aiding ICU discharge decisions and advancing knowledge discovery in the ICU.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.