Trial reportSleep2026
Augmenting management of obstructive sleep apnea with consumer wearable devices to increase use of positive airway pressure therapy: a pilot randomized trial.
Trial report in Sleep, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Comparison of under-mattress sensor and CPAP data for home monitoring in obstructive sleep apnea.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
STUDY
objectivesThis pilot randomized trial measured the effects of a consumer-grade wearable-augmented program, which provides nightly pulse oximetry data to patients in a weekly report, on positive airway pressure (PAP) use in adults with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) recruited from an outpatient sleep center.
methodsThis single-blind, parallel, two-group waitlist-controlled, single-site randomized trial recruited individuals with OSA with insufficient PAP use from a Department of Veterans Affairs medical center and randomized them to immediate participation in the consumer wearable-augmented self-monitoring program versus waitlist. The primary outcome was the change in modem-measured PAP use (mean hours or minutes per night over a 7-day period) from baseline (T1) to T3 assessment, which was 35 days following randomization (7 days post-intervention for the immediate group and prior to intervention for the waitlist group).
resultsWe randomized 50 participants (mean age 47.9 years [SD 11.4]; 88% male). The change in PAP use was +1.33 hours (+79.8 minutes) for the immediate group and -0.17 hours (-10.2 minutes) for the waitlist control group, with a between-group difference of 1.50 hours (90 minutes) (p = .0097). The change in the number of days PAP was used for 4 hours or more over a 7-day period was +1.32 days for the immediate and 0.12 days for the waitlist control group, with a between-group difference of 1.20 (p = .0401).
conclusionsThis pilot trial demonstrated that the consumer-grade wearable-augmented program is a promising intervention for increasing PAP use. A future full-scale trial that follows participants for a longer period is needed. Statement of Significance This pilot trial tested a novel use of the pulse oximetry feature available on some consumer-grade wearable devices to increase use of positive airway pressure (PAP) devices among adults with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and insufficient PAP use. The widespread and growing use of consumer-grade wearable devices offers an opportunity to leverage the features on these devices to tackle a common, problematic issue among individuals with OSA-insufficient use of PAP therapy. The randomized controlled design provides support for future research involving these devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.