ArticleJournal of hospital medicine2026
Decision fatigue in hospital medicine: A retrospective exploratory evaluation.
Article in Journal of hospital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
background"Decision fatigue" (DF) is the deterioration in decision-making ability stemming from repeated decision making.
objectiveExplore DF over the clinical workblock and across hospitalist and work characteristics.
methodsPatients seen by hospitalists at two hospitals in January and February 2022 were retrospectively evaluated for events that may reflect DF. Events were selected through multistakeholder discussion (prescription of pharmacologically antagonistic medications, occurrence of hypoglycemia, and potential overuse of blood transfusions, imaging, and penicillin alternatives). For each date, schedules determined the number of days each hospitalist had been on service and charges submitted assessed census and physician familiarity with their team. Charges and ordering data guided event attribution. The primary predictor was the number of days on service, and the outcome was event occurrence. Secondary predictors included hospitalist gender, weekend versus weekday, census, site, and degree of familiarity.
resultsDuring the study, 43 hospitalists worked 1306 days over 204 working blocks, providing care to 2081 patients over 3122 encounters. Median daily census was 13, median number of consecutive days worked was seven. DF events were not associated with the primary or secondary predictors except census. In the multivariable model, each one unit increase in the number of patients was associated with event occurrence (odds ratio [OR]: 1.107, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.022-1.198, p = .01). The odds of an event were 1.58 times greater at workloads above the median of 13 patients, compared with workloads ≤13. (p = .002).
conclusionDF was not detected with an increasing number of days on clinical service. The findings highlight how workloads may threaten care quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.