ArticleNanomedicine (London, England)2025
Quantitative proteomic and phenotypic responses of urinary pathogens to CuO/Cu₂O nanoparticles.
Article in Nanomedicine (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsTo evaluate the antibacterial efficacy of pulsed laser ablation-generated copper oxide (CuO/Cu₂O) nanoparticles (NPs) against urinary pathogens and to elucidate molecular stress responses through proteomic profiling.
methods
resultsCuO/Cu₂O NPs significantly reduced viability, with
conclusionsCuO/Cu₂O NPs exert rapid antibacterial activity via oxidative stress, membrane disruption, and metabolic reprogramming. Distinct proteomic adaptations explain species differences in susceptibility and highlight copper nanoparticles as promising antimicrobial candidates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.