ArticlePlant biotechnology journal2026
Transgene-Free, Gene-Edited Cavendish Bananas (Musa acuminata, AAA).
Article in Plant biotechnology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A RUBY-Based Visual Hairy Root Transformation and CRISPR-Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Beyond GMOs: transgene-free gene-edited crops for global food security.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- Genome editing beyond transgenes: DNA-free technologies in crop improvement.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Global consumer acceptance of gene-edited food crops is increasing with new breeding technologies that can modify the genome without foreign DNA integration. Here, we report an Agrobacterium-based system for transgene-free, gene editing of the banana cultivar, Cavendish. The protocol uses a three-tiered approach whereby cells containing T-DNA are enriched by positive antibiotic selection over a 48-h period, CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing occurs over a short transient window and negative selection of cells containing T-DNA is achieved by the addition of 5-FC, which is converted to cytotoxic 5-FU by the co-expressed CODA enzyme. Two key enzymes in the carotenoid biosynthesis pathway were targeted as visual markers of editing: phytoene desaturase (pds) and lycopene β-cyclase (LCYb). Disruptive edits of the LCYb gene were easily identifiable at the calli stage of the regeneration process with cells appearing pink due to lycopene accumulation. Eight of 32 plants for pds and 34 of 125 plants for LCYb contained edits and were likely free of integrated vector DNA as determined by targeted genome sequencing and T-DNA-specific PCR, respectively. Plants containing disruptive tri-allelic edits in either gene displayed an albino phenotype. A subset of potentially transgene-free, edited plants was verified by whole genome sequencing. The transient editing protocol has an estimated 17.6% to 21.9% efficiency in generating plants containing disruptive tri-allelic modifications that are free of novel DNA. The protocol overcomes the regulatory limitations associated with the release of gene-edited, vegetatively propagated crops and provides an effective means of creating new disease-resistant and agronomically superior Cavendish cultivars.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.