Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41159426›Full record

ArticlePlant biotechnology journal2026

Transgene-Free, Gene-Edited Cavendish Bananas (Musa acuminata, AAA).

Maiko Kato, Jen Kleidon, Amba Phillips, Alexandra Tabrett, Robert Harding, James Dale, Jean-Yves Paul

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant biotechnology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Maiko KatoCentre for Agriculture and the Bioeconomy, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-4967-8126
Jen KleidonCentre for Agriculture and the Bioeconomy, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-6595-8029
Amba PhillipsCentre for Agriculture and the Bioeconomy, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-9205-0772
Alexandra TabrettCentre for Agriculture and the Bioeconomy, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-4087-4721
Robert HardingCentre for Agriculture and the Bioeconomy, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9600-7287
James DaleCentre for Agriculture and the Bioeconomy, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7910-5707
Jean-Yves PaulCentre for Agriculture and the Bioeconomy, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3246-2210

Funding

Australian Banana Research Pty LtdCooperative Research Centre Projects
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Global consumer acceptance of gene-edited food crops is increasing with new breeding technologies that can modify the genome without foreign DNA integration. Here, we report an Agrobacterium-based system for transgene-free, gene editing of the banana cultivar, Cavendish. The protocol uses a three-tiered approach whereby cells containing T-DNA are enriched by positive antibiotic selection over a 48-h period, CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing occurs over a short transient window and negative selection of cells containing T-DNA is achieved by the addition of 5-FC, which is converted to cytotoxic 5-FU by the co-expressed CODA enzyme. Two key enzymes in the carotenoid biosynthesis pathway were targeted as visual markers of editing: phytoene desaturase (pds) and lycopene β-cyclase (LCYb). Disruptive edits of the LCYb gene were easily identifiable at the calli stage of the regeneration process with cells appearing pink due to lycopene accumulation. Eight of 32 plants for pds and 34 of 125 plants for LCYb contained edits and were likely free of integrated vector DNA as determined by targeted genome sequencing and T-DNA-specific PCR, respectively. Plants containing disruptive tri-allelic edits in either gene displayed an albino phenotype. A subset of potentially transgene-free, edited plants was verified by whole genome sequencing. The transient editing protocol has an estimated 17.6% to 21.9% efficiency in generating plants containing disruptive tri-allelic modifications that are free of novel DNA. The protocol overcomes the regulatory limitations associated with the release of gene-edited, vegetatively propagated crops and provides an effective means of creating new disease-resistant and agronomically superior Cavendish cultivars.

Indexed as

Gene EditingMusaCarotenoidsCRISPR-Cas SystemsDNA, BacterialIntramolecular LyasesOxidoreductasesPlants, Genetically ModifiedTransgenesCarotenoidsDNA, BacterialIntramolecular Lyaseslycopene cyclase-isomeraseOxidoreductasesphytoene dehydrogenaseT-DNAcarotenoidsCavendish bananaCRISPR/Cas9gene editinggene knockoutintegration‐freenon‐GMT‐DNA‐freetransgene‐freetransient expression

Identifiers

PMID41159426
PMCPMC12946447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.