ArticleThe Gerontologist2025
Experiences of double-duty caregivers: a scoping review.
Article in The Gerontologist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesIn an aging society, there is an increasing demand for both formal and informal care. This particularly impacts health care professionals who privately care for an ill relative (double-duty caregivers). This study aims to investigate the state of scientific knowledge on their lived experiences. RESEARCH DESIGN AND
methodsScoping review.
resultsOverall, 2,483 articles were screened, of which 36 articles were eventually included. The studies were conducted in various, mostly Western, countries. Double-duty caregivers lived experiences were found to fall across different themes. Because of their professional knowledge, they themselves and others expect them to be involved in the care for ill relatives. Double-duty caregivers experience mental and emotional consequences. At work, they experience presenteeism and make errors. According to literature, double-duty caregivers need a supportive work environment, like an understanding manager and supporting colleagues. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Several responsibilities of double-duty caregivers overlap with those of informal caregivers in general, while others differ. Given their professional knowledge, double-duty caregivers are likely to more frequently monitor and advise for their ill family members. Support at work should be a shared responsibility between employer and employee. Solutions may also emerge from the network of the ill relative and the double-duty caregiver and the health care organization involved in providing care to the ill relative. Double-duty caregivers, employers, and the care organization involved with the ill relative must be aware of the increasing burden on double-duty caregivers and implement measures to support them.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.