Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41159381›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2025

Endowing protein language models with structural knowledge.

Philip Hartout, Dexiong Chen, Paolo Pellizzoni, Carlos Oliver, Karsten Borgwardt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. PUFFIN: protein unit discovery with functional supervision.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. bindNode24: Competitive binding residue prediction with 60 % smaller model.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025
    Article
  13. How the technologies behind self-driving cars, social networks, ChatGPT, and DALL-E2 are changing structural biology.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Philip HartoutDepartment of Machine Learning and Systems Biology, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Bavaria, Martinsried 82152, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1067-7651
Dexiong ChenDepartment of Machine Learning and Systems Biology, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Bavaria, Martinsried 82152, Germany.
Paolo PellizzoniDepartment of Machine Learning and Systems Biology, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Bavaria, Martinsried 82152, Germany.
Carlos OliverDepartment of Machine Learning and Systems Biology, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Bavaria, Martinsried 82152, Germany.
Karsten BorgwardtDepartment of Machine Learning and Systems Biology, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Bavaria, Martinsried 82152, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7221-2393

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationProtein language models (PLMs) have transformed protein research by learning rich representations from sequence data alone, yet they largely ignore the wealth of structural information now available through advances in structure prediction. Current methods that incorporate structural data often require substantial computational resources and complex architectures, limiting their practical adoption. We present a novel joint sequence and structure embedding method that achieves computational and parameter efficiency while maintaining high performance. Our approach introduces a lightweight integration framework that combines pretrained sequence transformers' self-attention with specialized structural adapters, enabling seamless incorporation of structural knowledge into existing PLMs through these enhanced self-attention mechanisms.

resultsThe method demonstrates remarkable efficiency, requiring only modest pretraining on 542K protein structures, three orders of magnitude less than the data used to train PLMs, using standard masked language modeling objectives. Despite this lightweight approach, our joint embeddings consistently outperform sequence-only models like ESM-2 while achieving comparable results to more complex structure-based methods that use significantly more parameters and computational resources. This work establishes a new paradigm for protein representation learning that balances performance with practical constraints. By providing computationally efficient joint sequence-structure embeddings, we offer the scientific community an accessible tool that captures both sequential and structural protein information without the computational overhead typically associated with structure-aware models. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: code and links to checkpoints are available at https://github.com/BorgwardtLab/PST.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyProteinsAlgorithmsDatabases, ProteinModels, MolecularProtein ConformationSequence Analysis, ProteinSoftwareProteins

Identifiers

PMID41159381
PMCPMC12603367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.