Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41159328›Full record

Trial reportHua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology2025

[Evaluation of the clinical effect of concentrated growth factor combined with sticky bone in maxillary anterior alveolar ridge preservation].

Xueqin Wei, Shengzhi Zhang, Kai Ba

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative StudyEnglish Abstract
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xueqin WeiDept. of Stomatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, China.
Shengzhi ZhangDept. of Stomatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, China.
Kai BaDept. of Stomatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo compare the clinical effects of concentrated growth factor (CGF) membrane and Bio-Gide

methodsThirty patients who needed alveolar ridge preservation after maxillary anterior tooth extraction were selected and randomly assigned to the Bio-Gide group and the CGF group. In both groups, the extraction sockets were tightly filled with the Bio-Oss

resultsAt 6 months after ARP, there was no statistically significant difference in the changes of alveolar bone width and height between the two groups (

conclusionsCompared with the Bio-Gide

Indexed as

Alveolar ProcessAlveolar Ridge AugmentationBone SubstitutesIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMineralsAdultAlveolar Bone LossCollagenFemaleHumansMaleMaxillaMembranes, ArtificialMiddle AgedTooth ExtractionTooth SocketBio-GideBio-OssBone SubstitutesCollagenIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMembranes, ArtificialMineralsalveolar ridge preservationcollagen membraneconcentrated growth factorimplantsticky bone

Identifiers

PMID41159328
PMCPMC12573711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.