ReviewSurgical innovation2026
Can Artificial Intelligence Revolutionise Surgical Decision-Making for Appendectomy? A Narrative Review.
Review in Surgical innovation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
IntroductionAcute appendicitis is a common cause of acute abdomen in secondary care. Despite advancements in diagnostics, misdiagnosis and negative appendectomies remain significant. Artificial Intelligence (AI), particularly machine learning (ML) and deep learning, shows promise in improving diagnostic accuracy.Materials and MethodsA literature review using PubMed and Cochrane databases included studies on AI's role in diagnosing and prognosing appendicitis. Studies relying solely on clinical or radiology reports were excluded.ResultsAI models, particularly random forest (RF), logistic regression (LR), and neural networks (NN), demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy, with RF outperforming others. Machine learning methods like SVM and XGBoost (XGB) were effective in predicting appendicitis prognosis, especially in distinguishing complicated cases. AI models outperformed traditional diagnostic scores, such as the Alvarado score.ConclusionAI has significant potential to enhance the diagnosis and prognosis of acute appendicitis, but challenges in data requirements and standardisation must be addressed for widespread clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.