Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41159301›Full record

ReviewSurgical innovation2026

Can Artificial Intelligence Revolutionise Surgical Decision-Making for Appendectomy? A Narrative Review.

Ali Murtada, Marco David Bokobza De la Rosa, Fatima Kayali, Albert Mensah, Shuaiyb Majid, Samuel N S Ghattas, Samuel S S Rezk, Ian Williams, Damian M Bailey, Matti Jubouri and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Surgical innovation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ali MurtadaDepartment of General Surgery, Glan Clwyd Hospital, Rhyl, UK.
Marco David Bokobza De la RosaLancaster Medical School, University of Lancaster, UK.ORCID 0009-0005-8447-264X
Fatima KayaliRotational Departments, University Hospital Sussex, Worthing, UK.
Albert MensahRotational Departments, University Hospital Sussex, Worthing, UK.
Shuaiyb MajidDepartment of General Surgery, Diana Princess of Wales Hospital, Grimsby, UK.
Samuel N S GhattasDepartment of General Surgery, Glan Clwyd Hospital, Rhyl, UK.
Samuel S S RezkDepartment of General Surgery, Glan Clwyd Hospital, Rhyl, UK.
Ian WilliamsDepartment of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK.
Damian M BaileyNeurovascular Research Laboratory, Faculty of Life Sciences and Education, University of South Wales, Pontypridd, UK.
Matti JubouriHull York Medical School, University of York, UK.
Mohamad BashirNeurovascular Research Laboratory, Faculty of Life Sciences and Education, University of South Wales, Pontypridd, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

IntroductionAcute appendicitis is a common cause of acute abdomen in secondary care. Despite advancements in diagnostics, misdiagnosis and negative appendectomies remain significant. Artificial Intelligence (AI), particularly machine learning (ML) and deep learning, shows promise in improving diagnostic accuracy.Materials and MethodsA literature review using PubMed and Cochrane databases included studies on AI's role in diagnosing and prognosing appendicitis. Studies relying solely on clinical or radiology reports were excluded.ResultsAI models, particularly random forest (RF), logistic regression (LR), and neural networks (NN), demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy, with RF outperforming others. Machine learning methods like SVM and XGBoost (XGB) were effective in predicting appendicitis prognosis, especially in distinguishing complicated cases. AI models outperformed traditional diagnostic scores, such as the Alvarado score.ConclusionAI has significant potential to enhance the diagnosis and prognosis of acute appendicitis, but challenges in data requirements and standardisation must be addressed for widespread clinical use.

Indexed as

AppendectomyAppendicitisArtificial IntelligenceClinical Decision-MakingHumansMachine Learningappendectomyappendicitisartificial intelligence

Identifiers

PMID41159301
PMCPMC12920674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.