ArticleBiometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift2025
Non-Markov Nonparametric Estimation of Complex Multistate Outcomes After Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.
Article in Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Non-Markov Nonparametric Estimation of Complex Multistate Outcomes After Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Often probabilities of nonstandard time-to-event endpoints are of interest, which are more complex than overall survival. One such probability is chronic graft-versus-host disease (GvHD-) and relapse-free survival, the probability of being alive, in remission, and not suffering from chronic GvHD after stem cell transplantation, with chronic GvHD being a recurrent event. Because the probabilities for endpoints with recurrent events may not fall monotonically, one should not use the Kaplan-Meier estimator for estimation, but the Aalen-Johansen estimator. The Aalen-Johansen is a consistent estimator even in non-Markov scenarios if state occupation probabilities are being estimated and censoring is random. In some multistate models, it is also possible to use linear combinations of Kaplan-Meier estimators, which do not depend on the Markov assumption but can estimate probabilities to be out of bounds. For these linear combinations, we propose a wild bootstrap procedure for inference and compare it with the wild bootstrap for the Aalen-Johansen estimator in non-Markov scenarios. In the proposed procedure, the limiting distribution of the Nelson-Aalen estimator is approximated using the wild bootstrap and transformed via the functional delta method. This approach is adaptable to different multistate models. Using real data, confidence bands are generated using the wild bootstrap for chronic GvHD- and relapse-free survival. Additionally, coverage probabilities of confidence intervals and confidence bands generated by Efron's bootstrap and the wild bootstrap are examined with simulations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.