Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41159245›Full record

ReviewExperimental physiology2026

The clinical and physiological profiles of kissing stents in endovascular reconstruction of aortoiliac occlusive disease.

Christopher J Goulden, Matti Jubouri, Eka Narayan, Sakshi Roy, Fatima Kayali, Wael I Awad, Damian M Bailey, Ian M Williams, Mohamad Bashir

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Experimental physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Christopher J GouldenLiverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Matti JubouriHull York Medical School, University of York, York, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6725-6164
Eka NarayanHull York Medical School, University of York, York, UK.
Sakshi RoySchool of Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Fatima KayaliLiverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Wael I AwadDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK.
Damian M BaileyNeurovascular Research Laboratory, Faculty of Life Sciences and Education, University of South Wales, Pontypridd, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0498-7095
Ian M WilliamsDepartment of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK.
Mohamad BashirNeurovascular Research Laboratory, Faculty of Life Sciences and Education, University of South Wales, Pontypridd, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8040-5811

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aortoiliac occlusive disease affecting the abdominal aorta and iliac arteries is conventionally treated with open surgical repair and is the mainstay of treatment. Endovascular techniques have become a less invasive alternative, especially for high-risk patients. Kissing stents are particularly useful in this situation and involve the placement of two stents at the aortic bifurcation to achieve satisfactory perfusion to both the iliac arteries. These stents can be bare-metal or covered stents with varied physiological characteristics and differing clinical outcomes. Bare-metal stents are more prone to restenosis due to neointimal hyperplasia, whereas covered stents minimise tissue ingrowth and are associated with improved patency. Both in vitro and in vivo studies have demonstrated that stent design and deployment significantly influence blood flow patterns, shear stress and long-term patency. Radial mismatch and turbulent flow have also been reported to impact the durability of kissing stents. Covered stents tend to outperform bare-metal stents in complex lesions with lower reintervention rates and improved perfusion as indicated by improvement in ankle-brachial indices. While short-term outcomes for kissing stents are favourable, especially in high-risk patients, long-term patency remains a concern and requires further evaluation. This review evaluates kissing stents' clinical performance and physiological implications in aortoiliac occlusive disease and discusses anatomical and pathological considerations in selecting the optimal endovascular strategy.

Indexed as

Aorta, AbdominalAortic DiseasesArterial Occlusive DiseasesEndovascular ProceduresIliac ArteryStentsHumansVascular Patencyaortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD)aortoiliac reconstructionbare‐metal stents (BMS)covered stents (CS)endovascular reconstructionkissing stents

Identifiers

PMID41159245
PMCPMC13140722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.