ReviewExperimental physiology2026
The clinical and physiological profiles of kissing stents in endovascular reconstruction of aortoiliac occlusive disease.
Review in Experimental physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The clinical and physiological profiles of kissing stents in endovascular reconstruction of aortoiliac occlusive disease.Experimental physiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aortoiliac occlusive disease affecting the abdominal aorta and iliac arteries is conventionally treated with open surgical repair and is the mainstay of treatment. Endovascular techniques have become a less invasive alternative, especially for high-risk patients. Kissing stents are particularly useful in this situation and involve the placement of two stents at the aortic bifurcation to achieve satisfactory perfusion to both the iliac arteries. These stents can be bare-metal or covered stents with varied physiological characteristics and differing clinical outcomes. Bare-metal stents are more prone to restenosis due to neointimal hyperplasia, whereas covered stents minimise tissue ingrowth and are associated with improved patency. Both in vitro and in vivo studies have demonstrated that stent design and deployment significantly influence blood flow patterns, shear stress and long-term patency. Radial mismatch and turbulent flow have also been reported to impact the durability of kissing stents. Covered stents tend to outperform bare-metal stents in complex lesions with lower reintervention rates and improved perfusion as indicated by improvement in ankle-brachial indices. While short-term outcomes for kissing stents are favourable, especially in high-risk patients, long-term patency remains a concern and requires further evaluation. This review evaluates kissing stents' clinical performance and physiological implications in aortoiliac occlusive disease and discusses anatomical and pathological considerations in selecting the optimal endovascular strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.