ArticleJournal of separation science2025
Development of a Direct Sampling Module for Compact Capillary Liquid Chromatography.
Article in Journal of separation science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development of a Direct Sampling Module for Compact Capillary Liquid Chromatography.Journal of separation science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The automation of reaction monitoring analysis can greatly improve the capability to obtain real-time feedback on reaction progress and aid in method optimization. Liquid chromatography (LC) is a widely used analytical technique for organic reaction monitoring, but the large size of the instrumentation can make online analysis difficult and impractical. Compact and miniaturized LC instrumentation provides the opportunity to simplify the process of analyzing samples at the reaction site, but the smaller scale of capillary LC columns is often incompatible with commercial reaction sampling systems designed to work with larger volumes. Here, a compact sampling module (CSM) designed to automate sample collection from a variety of reaction devices with volumes that are compatible with capillary LC is reported. The design and operation of the system are described, as well as example uses within a conventional medicinal chemistry setting. Specifically, the real-time analysis of both standard reactions in flow and batch settings with sampling performed by the CSM is described. Furthermore, the utility of the module in analyzing photoredox-based reactions, which are currently experiencing significant growth within drug discovery, is described. Performance of the system is compared to a traditional benchtop LC instrument that is currently used as the primary platform for standard reaction analysis, with a repeatability comparison between the systems demonstrating averages of 0.8%RSD (percentage relative standard deviation) for retention time and 2.5%RSD for peak area on the compact system and 1.4 and 9.4%RSD, respectively, for the benchtop system. The average observed carryover using the compact LC with CSM was also lower than the benchtop LC (0.3% and 1.5%, respectively), although detection limits were higher due to the shorter pathlength on-column ultraviolet-absorbance flow cell used in this work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.