Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41159212›Full record

ArticleJournal of separation science2025

Development of a Direct Sampling Module for Compact Capillary Liquid Chromatography.

Nicholas Doupsas, Matthew Morse, Michael Powell, Muhammad Alimuddin, John Braganza, Jeff Elleraas, Wei Wang, Alex Yanovsky, Milton L Lee, Paul F Richardson and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of separation science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Nicholas DoupsasAnalytical Synthesis Technologies, Pfizer Inc., La Jolla, California, USA.
Matthew MorseAxcend LLC, Lehi, Utah, USA.
Michael PowellAxcend LLC, Lehi, Utah, USA.
Muhammad AlimuddinAnalytical Synthesis Technologies, Pfizer Inc., La Jolla, California, USA.
John BraganzaAnalytical Synthesis Technologies, Pfizer Inc., La Jolla, California, USA.
Jeff ElleraasAnalytical Synthesis Technologies, Pfizer Inc., La Jolla, California, USA.
Wei WangAnalytical Synthesis Technologies, Pfizer Inc., La Jolla, California, USA.
Alex YanovskyAnalytical Synthesis Technologies, Pfizer Inc., La Jolla, California, USA.
Milton L LeeAxcend LLC, Lehi, Utah, USA.
Paul F RichardsonAnalytical Synthesis Technologies, Pfizer Inc., La Jolla, California, USA.
James P GriniasDepartment of Chemistry & Biochemistry, Rowan University, Glassboro, New Jersey, USA.

Funding

Portable Liquid Chromatography Platform for Diverse Pharmaceutical ApplicationsR44GM137649 · NIGMS · AXCEND, LLC · PI LEE, MILTON L. · 2020 to 2022
$1.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R44 GM137649NIH HHS R44 GM137649
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The automation of reaction monitoring analysis can greatly improve the capability to obtain real-time feedback on reaction progress and aid in method optimization. Liquid chromatography (LC) is a widely used analytical technique for organic reaction monitoring, but the large size of the instrumentation can make online analysis difficult and impractical. Compact and miniaturized LC instrumentation provides the opportunity to simplify the process of analyzing samples at the reaction site, but the smaller scale of capillary LC columns is often incompatible with commercial reaction sampling systems designed to work with larger volumes. Here, a compact sampling module (CSM) designed to automate sample collection from a variety of reaction devices with volumes that are compatible with capillary LC is reported. The design and operation of the system are described, as well as example uses within a conventional medicinal chemistry setting. Specifically, the real-time analysis of both standard reactions in flow and batch settings with sampling performed by the CSM is described. Furthermore, the utility of the module in analyzing photoredox-based reactions, which are currently experiencing significant growth within drug discovery, is described. Performance of the system is compared to a traditional benchtop LC instrument that is currently used as the primary platform for standard reaction analysis, with a repeatability comparison between the systems demonstrating averages of 0.8%RSD (percentage relative standard deviation) for retention time and 2.5%RSD for peak area on the compact system and 1.4 and 9.4%RSD, respectively, for the benchtop system. The average observed carryover using the compact LC with CSM was also lower than the benchtop LC (0.3% and 1.5%, respectively), although detection limits were higher due to the shorter pathlength on-column ultraviolet-absorbance flow cell used in this work.

Indexed as

capillary liquid chromatographycompactprocess analyticalsampling

Identifiers

PMID41159212
PMCPMC12569728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.