ReviewFrontiers in neurology2025
Treatment and prognosis of failure of first-line immunotherapy or recurrent autoimmune encephalitis patients with ofatumumab-a fully human anti-CD20 mAb.
Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Ofatumumab Therapy and Long-Term Seizure Outcomes of Patients With Relapsing Anti-NMDA Receptor Encephalitis.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Autoimmune encephalitis (AE) is a kind of encephalitis mediated by the autoimmune response. There is no uniform standard for immunotherapy of this disease, especially for failure of first-line immunotherapy or recurrent AE. Here, we report the case data of patients with failure of first-line immunotherapy or recurrent AE who were treated with ofatumumab (OFA). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 18 patients with failure of first-line immunotherapy or recurrent adverse events treated with OFA. We collected general information, clinical manifestations, auxiliary examinations, treatment and prognosis, and adverse reactions. A retrospective analysis was conducted on these data, and the results were discussed in conjunction with a review of the relevant literature. Results: Among the 18 patients treated with OFA, significant improvements were observed in psychiatric symptoms ( Conclusion: Clinical data indicate that OFA demonstrates therapeutic efficacy in failure of first-line immunotherapy or recurrent AE, as evidenced by improved symptom control, decreased relapse rates, and an acceptable safety profile. However, this study is retrospective, and the clinical sample size is small, which may be biased. In the follow-up study, we will further expand the scale of case collection to further prove the efficacy and prognosis of OFA in treating AE patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.