Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41159184›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2025

Student self-esteem in music education contexts: a systematic literature review.

Xin Jiang, Yanli Tong

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xin JiangDepartment of Music and Education, Chuzhou University, Chuzhou City, Anhui, China.
Yanli TongFaculty of Language and Culture, Ningde Normal University, Ningde, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This systematic literature review (1970-2023) examines how music education relates to students' self-esteem. Although interest has grown since 1970, evidence remains dispersed across designs and populations. Methods: Following the PEO (population, exposure, outcome) framework and PRISMA guidelines, we systematically searched EBSCO, Scopus, and Web of Science. Of 1,332 records identified, we screened empirical studies of students engaged in formal or informal music learning that reported self-esteem outcomes. We extracted trends, methods, measurement tools, and results, and appraised methodological quality. Results: Twenty-two studies met inclusion criteria (18 quantitative; 4 mixed-methods), with a predominance of cross-sectional designs. Quantitative studies showed stronger methodological quality (mean, x̅ = 0.79), whereas qualitative components of mixed-methods studies were lower (x̅ = 0.43). The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale was the most widely used instrument. Across studies, self-esteem in music education was associated with demographic factors (e.g., gender, age) and psychological factors (e.g., self-efficacy). Overall, music learning was linked to enhanced self-esteem among children and adolescents, with notable benefits for specific student groups. Discussion: Current evidence indicates a positive relationship between music education and students' self-esteem; however, generalizability is limited by the dominance of cross-sectional designs and uneven methodological quality. Future research should employ broader designs (e.g., longitudinal and experimental), include more diverse populations, and use consistent, validated measures to strengthen causal inference and applicability.

Indexed as

music educationPRISMAself-esteemstudentsystematic literature review

Identifiers

PMID41159184
PMCPMC12554761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.