ReviewFrontiers in psychology2025
Beyond the bipolar: allowing satisfaction and dissatisfaction to coexist.
Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper advances a separable, multi-dimensional account of satisfaction and dissatisfaction, proposing that they are distinct constructs that can coexist, particularly in contexts involving ambivalence and indifference. When we specify measurement, we operationalize this account with bivariate unipolar items (separate single-ended scales for both satisfaction and dissatisfaction) rather than a single unidimensional bipolar continuum. Drawing upon theories from psychology-including Herzberg's Two-Factor Theory, Watson and Tellegen's Circumplex Model of Affect, Cacioppo's Evaluative Space Model, and Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory-we argue that positive and negative emotions are processed separately in the human mind, allowing for the simultaneous experience of satisfaction and dissatisfaction, rather than placing them on two ends of a single bipolar spectrum. By reviewing evidence from psychological sciences, information science, human-computer interaction, and other disciplines, we highlight the limitations of bipolar scales in capturing the complexity of human emotional states and the full range of human experience. We review qualitative and empirical evidence demonstrating that satisfaction and dissatisfaction arise from different factors and have unique influences on behavior and decision-making. Recognizing them as separate constructs allows for more accurate measurement and better understanding of phenomena involving ambivalence and indifference. We offer practical guidance for researchers on when to use bivariate unipolar versus bipolar scales, how to identify contextual factors contributing to satisfaction and dissatisfaction, and how to design measurement tools that capture the nuances of these constructs. Through this narrative literature review, we embrace the idea that a separable, multidimensional perspective facilitates a more complete understanding of human emotions, motivations, and behaviors, leading to deeper insights and more effective strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.