Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41159174›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Research on the visual search behavior and decision-making ability of basketball referees.

Rishu Wang, Long Chen, Yidong Wu, Qi Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rishu WangSchool of Athletic Performance, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, China.
Long ChenSchool of Physical Education and Equestrian, Wuhan Business University, Wuhan, China.
Yidong WuSchool of Economics and Management, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, China.
Qi ZhangSchool of Economics and Management, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In sports, basketball referees have to face high pressure and time constraints, efficient visual search behavior and decision-making particularly important. Methods: This study compared different levels of experience (expert group, Results: The results showed that, compared with the non-expert group, the expert group had higher decision-making accuracy ( Conclusion: Our research indicates that there are significant differences in the visual search behaviors of basketball referees with different experiences. These data can provide valuable insights into the visual search patterns of basketball referees in real game environments and emphasize the importance of refereeing expertise for basketball referees.

Indexed as

basketball refereedecision-makingexperiencerefereevisual search behavior

Identifiers

PMID41159174
PMCPMC12557578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.