ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Employee creativity and innovation in higher education institutions: applying the dynamic componential model of creativity and innovation.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A sustainable bilingual learning ecosystem in higher education: teacher and peer support under SDG 4.7.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In today's highly competitive landscape, higher education institutions must adopt innovative practices to thrive and maintain academic excellence. The engagement of academic staff is essential for driving such innovation. While previous studies have examined the influence of personal and workplace factors separately, this study investigates the roles of employee resilience, emotional intelligence, and job autonomy-alongside the mediating effect of employee creativity-on employee innovation in higher education, drawing on the Dynamic Componential Model of Creativity and Innovation. Methods: A quantitative research design was used, surveying 307 academic staff members from federal and state universities in South-Western Nigeria. The study employed a structural equation modeling approach via SmartPLS4 to test the hypothesized relationships among employee resilience, emotional intelligence, job autonomy, creativity, and innovation. Results: The findings confirm that employee resilience, emotional intelligence, and job autonomy significantly contribute to employee innovation. Additionally, mediation analysis reveals that both resilience and job autonomy foster innovation indirectly through employee creativity, whereas emotional intelligence does not exert a significant indirect effect. Discussion: These results underscore the importance of cultivating resilience, autonomy, emotional intelligence, and creativity among academic staff as a strategic means to promote innovation within universities. They demonstrate that interventions emphasizing both personal growth and supportive work environments can meaningfully advance innovative practices and enhance academic excellence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.