ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
The influence of affective touch on interoceptive and exteroceptive sensory integration in infants: evidence from heartbeat-evoked and event-related potentials.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The daily accumulation of multimodal interactions with a primary caregiver is thought to integrate interoceptive and exteroceptive information in the infant brain, which may contribute to the development of social cognition. However, the neural mechanisms underlying this integration in infancy remain largely unexplored. Focusing on affective touch as a sensory stimulus affecting infants' interoception during caregiver-infant interactions, this study examined how the perception of affective touch (i.e., stroking) affects the neural processing of interoceptive-exteroceptive integration in infants' brains. Methods: During the exposure phase, infants' legs were stroked while viewing a stranger's face (Affective Touch, AT), while another face was presented without touch as a control (No-Affective Touch, No-AT). In the test phase, infants viewed the same faces in isolation. Electroencephalography (EEG) and electrocardiogram (ECG) were simultaneously measured to compare two neural indices between conditions in the test phase: heartbeat-evoked potentials (HEPs), reflecting interoceptive-exteroceptive integration, and event-related potentials (ERPs) to faces, indicating exteroceptive processing. Results: Results showed that affective touch enhanced HEPs in frontal-central regions and modulated ERPs to faces, with stronger P400 amplitudes in parietal regions. In addition, a positive correlation between HEP responses and ERPs to faces emerged, with individual differences in resting HEP, reflecting baseline interoceptive-exteroceptive sensitivity, being associated with HEP modulation during the test phase. Discussion: These findings suggest the role of multisensory experiences, particularly those involving touch, in enhancing interoceptive-exteroceptive integration, with individual variations. Our findings support the hypothesis that affective caregiver-infant interactions facilitate interoceptive-exteroceptive integration, a fundamental process underlying the development of social cognition, and emotional regulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.