ReviewInternational journal of pharmaceutics: X2025
Structured engineering of self-emulsifying drug delivery systems (SEDDS)
Review in International journal of pharmaceutics: X, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The combination of self-emulsifying drug delivery systems (SEDDS) with three-dimensional printing (3DP) technologies represents an innovative and promising strategy for developing personalised dosage forms. Through precise control over dosage form architecture, controlled drug release kinetics, and individualised therapeutic customisation, 3DP offers distinct and transformative advantages over conventional pharmaceutical formulation approaches. This review focuses on the application of modern 3DP techniques, specifically fused deposition modelling (FDM), semi-solid extrusion (SSE), and drop-on-demand (DoD), in the formulation and production of SEDDS. Each technique is critically evaluated in terms of formulation compatibility, operational mechanisms, and its potential to address the current manufacturing challenges associated with SEDDS. 3DP technologies offer several benefits, including enhanced flexibility in production, the ability to fabricate on demand, and the potential to accommodate complex and personalised therapeutic regimens. However, these methods also face notable limitations, such as material constraints, variability in print quality, mechanical and safety issues, and a lack of clear regulatory guidance. Despite their potential, the use of 3DP in SEDDS development remains relatively unexplored. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the current research landscape, identify existing technological and regulatory barriers, and discuss future prospects for integrating 3DP into next-generation SEDDS formulations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.