ArticlePublic health in practice (Oxford, England)2025
Integrating hepatitis and HIV point-of-care testing into mandatory migrant tuberculosis screening in the Netherlands: A feasibility and acceptability study.
Article in Public health in practice (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Role of Community Associations in HIV, HBV and HCV Screening and Support for Migrant Populations in France: Results of the DéPAC Study.Infectious diseases and therapy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: In the Netherlands, tuberculosis (TB) screening is mandatory for migrants from high incidence countries (>200 cases/100,000). These regions often have elevated rates of hepatitis B (HBV), hepatitis C (HCV) and HIV. The INTEGREAT-study assessed the feasibility and acceptability of integrating point-of-care testing (POCT) for these infections into existing TB screening, in line with UN Sustainable Development Goals. Study design: A mixed-methods study design was used. Methods: This study offered POCT using finger-prick blood and a brief medical history questionnaire during the public health TB screening. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively. Qualitative data from four focus groups with healthcare workers evaluating implementation were deductively and inductively coded. Results: Of 293 eligible individuals, 231 (78.8 %) participated. Participants (51.1 % male, mean age 31.9 years) originated from India (27.7 %), South Africa (24.7 %), Pakistan (7.4 %), and other countries (40.2 %). Three participants (1.3 %) tested positive for HIV or HBV and were referred to care if appropriate. Most participants (90 %) preferred finger-prick POCT over venipuncture. Focus groups highlighted the importance of a clear protocol and skilled staff for successful implementation. Conclusions: This study demonstrated the feasibility and acceptability of integrating POCT into TB screening, although the number of infections was low. Careful follow-up remains essential to ensure effective care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.