ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
Real-world study of adebrelimab as first-line therapy for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: a retrospective study.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) has a poor prognosis, with historical median overall survival (OS) of 8-13 months under platinum-etoposide chemotherapy. While phase III trials established adebrelimab (anti-PD-L1) plus chemotherapy as a new standard, real-world evidence remains scarce. This study evaluated real-world efficacy, safety, and prognostic factors of first-line adebrelimab-based therapy. Methods: In this retrospective study, thirty-five patients with ES-SCLC receiving adebrelimab as first-line treatment were analyzed. Endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), OS, and adverse events (AEs). Prognostic factors were assessed via Cox regression. Results: Median age was 72 years; 88.6% were male, 85.7% had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) 0-1, and 51.4% had ≥2 metastatic sites. ORR was 62.8%, DCR 77.1%. Median PFS was 7.1 months (95% CI: 5.47-8.53), and median OS was 15.0 months (95% CI: 10.47-19.53). Multivariate analysis identified ECOG PS ≥2 as an independent predictor of inferior PFS (HR = 9.446, p=0.013), while ≥2 metastatic organs (HR = 3.594, p=0.046) and C-reactive Protein (CRP) ≥5 mg/L (HR = 3.337, p=0.044) predicted worse OS. Grade 3-4 AEs occurred in 74.3% of patients, primarily hematologic toxicities (neutropenia: 51.4%); two cases (5.7%) of myocarditis were observed. Conclusions: Adebrelimab suggests potentially promising efficacy in ES-SCLC, aligning with pivotal trial data despite an older cohort. ECOG PS ≥2, high metastatic burden, and elevated CRP independently predict poorer outcomes. Vigilant monitoring for hematologic toxicity and rare cardiotoxicity is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.