ReviewPatient preference and adherence2025
Strategies for Enhancing Anticoagulation Adherence in Adult Patients After Cardiac Valve Replacement: An Evidence-Based Summary.
Review in Patient preference and adherence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Intelligent mobile health management for the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding in anticoagulated patients with cardiovascular disease.Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Heart valve replacement is one of the primary treatments for valvular heart disease. Postoperatively, patients require long-term anticoagulation therapy to prevent life-threatening thromboembolic events. However, poor patient adherence to anticoagulation can lead to complications such as thrombosis and embolism, adversely impacting patient prognosis. This study aimed to systematically search for the best available evidence on anticoagulation adherence management to provide evidence-based guidance for the clinical practice concerning adult patients after heart valve replacement. Methods: Following the "6S" evidence resource model, evidence retrieval was conducted in a top-down manner, collecting relevant guidelines, best practices, evidence summaries, systematic reviews, and expert consensuses. The search period was limited to databases from January 1, 2015, to May 31, 2025. Two evidence-trained researchers independently appraised the quality of the included literature. Evidence was then extracted and summarized according to the JBI evidence grading and recommendation system. Results: A total of 13 articles were finally included, comprising 5 clinical decisions, 1 evidence summary, 3 guidelines, 2 systematic reviews, 1 expert consensus, and 1 randomized controlled trial. Eighteen best evidence statements were summarized from four dimensions: symptom assessment, monitoring modalities and methods, quality control and management, and patient education. Conclusion: This study summarized the best evidence for anticoagulation adherence management after heart valve replacement across four dimensions. This can provide guidance for clinical or community healthcare professionals in developing and implementing interventions and practice programs to improve patient adherence to anticoagulation, thereby improving clinical outcomes and quality of life for patients post-heart valve replacement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.