Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41159003›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2025

Thermal-bias PCR: generation of amplicon libraries without degenerate primer interference.

Sean D Moore

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Sean D MooreBurnett School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1606-7771

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) has been used to amplify specific gene regions for many taxonomic studies and there have been substantial efforts to develop protocols that efficiently amplify target regions from a majority of mixed-template populations. Most protocols include the use of degenerate oligonucleotide primer pools, which contain mixed nucleotide sequences to improve priming from templates containing non-consensus sequence variations in their primer-binding sites. In this work, computational modeling and experimental measurements revealed that degenerate primers reduce efficiency well before a substantial product pool has been generated. It was also discovered that non-degenerate primers produced amplicons significantly better than their degenerate counterparts when amplifying either a consensus or a non-consensus target. Using quantitative, real-time PCR (qPCR) and data fitting as a guide, a new PCR protocol was developed that avoids the use of degenerate primers and allows for the stable amplification of targets containing mismatches to the targeting primers. This protocol involves the use of only two non-degenerate primers with no intermediate processing steps and it allows for the reproducible production of amplicon sequencing libraries that maintain the fractional representations of rare members.

Indexed as

DNA PrimersGene LibraryPolymerase Chain ReactionReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionDNA PrimersDegenerate primersPCR modelPolymerase chain reactionqPCRSequencing library

Identifiers

PMID41159003
PMCPMC12558157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.