ArticleDrug design, development and therapy2025
Chronic Inflammatory Comprehensive Signature Predicts Oxaliplatin and 5-Fluorouracil Benefit in Early Colorectal Cancer.
Article in Drug design, development and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Precision delivery of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) improves healthcare efficiency and postoperative quality of life in stage II-III colorectal cancer (CRC). However, there remains an unmet need for identifying biomarkers that can predict therapeutic responses to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and oxaliplatin. Methods: We analyzed three independent cohorts (1676 stage II-III surgical cases) to evaluate the prognostic role of 12 inflammatory indices. A novel Chronic Inflammatory Comprehensive Signature (CICS) was developed using multivariable Cox regression. Three-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between CICS-stratified subgroups (CICS-L vs CICS-H) receiving 5-FU- or oxaliplatin-based ACT. Results: Two novel inflammatory ratios (FPSIIR, FPSIRIR) and six composite scores (FPSIIS, FPSIRIS, FPSIRS, FASIIS, FASIRS, FASIRIS) independently predicted prognosis across all three cohorts (all Conclusion: CICS-quantified cancer-derived inflammation inversely correlates with the therapeutic responsiveness to 5-FU/oxaliplatin. A CICS-guided strategy maximizes survival outcomes while precision-deescalating chemotherapy use without compromising outcomes, establishing a biomarker-driven paradigm for personalized postoperative management of CRC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.