Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41158976›Full record

ArticleRisk management and healthcare policy2025

Precautionary Recommendation System in Risk Management: A FMEA-Based Approach.

Müfide Narlı

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Risk management and healthcare policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Müfide NarlıFaculty of Engineering, Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-8225-2911

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: FMEA (Failure Mode and Effects Analysis), a widely used tool in risk management, lacks systematic guidance on selecting the type of precaution. This study introduces a rule-based FMEA. Although the Risk Priority Number (RPN), widely used in the literature, expresses the risk level quantitatively, it is insufficient for guiding the appropriate type of precaution. The proposed rule-based model uses a multi-dimensional rule system that considers numerical parameters (probability, severity, detectability, and RPN) and contextual variables. Material and Methods: The model, structured according to the Occupational Health and Safety precaution hierarchy, defines six precaution classes: elimination, substitution, engineering measures, training, administrative measures, and personal protective equipment (PPE). The model's theoretical consistency, sensitivity, and practical applicability were tested in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Results: The FMEA method identified 24 failure modes related to infections. Scenario-based sensitivity analyses revealed that contextual variables significantly influenced the recommended precautions. Administrative and training measures were the most frequently recommended, while PPE was consistently recommended for exposure-related risks. Expert evaluation indicated 95.8% agreement with the model outputs. Conclusion: These findings indicate that the development of a rule-based system can serve as a repeatable and explainable decision-support tool, especially in high-risk settings such as healthcare, which is the study's most distinctive contribution.

Indexed as

decision support systemFMEArisk control measuresRPNrule-based decision model

Identifiers

PMID41158976
PMCPMC12558107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.