ArticleBMJ open sport & exercise medicine2025
Industry-supported healthcare programme for concussion management in junior community Australian football.
Article in BMJ open sport & exercise medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Junior Australian football players with sport-related concussion (SRC) often do not access optimal healthcare. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of an industry-supported healthcare programme that removed financial and logistical barriers to accessing care for SRC and adherence to the Australian Football League's (AFL) SRC management guidelines. Methods: Junior Australian football players (from a Melbourne-based league of 9852; under 8-18 competitions) who sustained a suspected or diagnosed SRC during the 2023 season were recruited. Players underwent assessment and management for SRC by a sport and exercise medicine registrar, including return to school and play planning in accordance with the AFL guidelines. Outcomes included programme demand, implementation, acceptability and adherence to the AFL's guidelines (median, (range) days for return to school, training and play). Results: From 154 eligible players, 58 (37.7%) participated, resulting in a weekly demand of 4.1 players (95% CI 3.1 to 5.2). 49 players were diagnosed with an SRC, and 9 players were cleared for SRC at their initial appointment. 44 players with SRC (89.8%) adhered to all medical advice and returned to play after receiving a medical clearance. All players returned to school (1 (0-10) days), unrestricted training (16 (2-53) days) and play (21 (7-63) days). Conclusion: The low programme demand indicates financial constraints and/or access to medical practitioners are not the main barriers for players with suspected SRC to formally seek healthcare in a metropolitan context. Those who did participate demonstrated high levels of appointment attendance, acceptability and adherence to AFL guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.