ArticleEJVES vascular forum2025
Cerebral Hypoperfusion Caused by Brachiocephalic Artery Stenosis.
Article in EJVES vascular forum, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Extracranial cerebrovascular disease can cause cerebral ischaemia through embolism or hypoperfusion. Managing cerebral ischaemia in patients with hypoperfusion and multivessel cerebrovascular disease can pose challenges owing to the risks of embolisation and haemodynamic instability, especially when normal embolisation protection techniques and cross clamping are hazardous. Report: This article presents the case of a 74 year old woman who experienced a peri-operative cardiac arrest during femoropopliteal bypass surgery, secondary to undiagnosed severe left ventricular hypertrophy with dynamic outflow obstruction. Following recovery, she developed recurrent right hemispheric transient ischaemic attacks including left hemiplegia. Imaging revealed mild to moderate bilateral carotid bulb, carotid siphon, and vertebral stenoses, but the most significant lesion was a severe, calcified stenosis of brachiocephalic artery. Given the recent cardiac arrest and multiple levels of the disease, the initial plan was for conservative management. Despite medical management with permissive hypertension, the patient continued to experience transient ischaemic attacks as soon as the systolic pressure dropped below 160 mmHg. This scenario led to a multidisciplinary decision to proceed with brachiocephalic artery stenting. The neurointerventional team recommended avoidance of cross clamping if possible given the severe lesions and lack of intact circle of Willis. The procedure was done under general anaesthesia via open, retrograde right axillary access without carotid cross clamping. The post-operative course was uneventful. Discussion: This case underscores the importance of procedural planning and a multidisciplinary approach in managing complex cerebrovascular conditions, and that unusual pathologies may need unusual treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.