ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025
Prevalence of ventilator-associated pneumonia and bacterial isolates in mechanically ventilated dogs.
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Mechanical ventilation is used to treat respiratory failure in veterinary patients. Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a reported complication of mechanical ventilation in both human and veterinary medicine. VAP can lead to increased length of mechanical ventilation, longer hospital stays, and increased mortality. While there are no gold-standard diagnostic criteria, the CDC has proposed surveillance guidelines for human medicine. A modified version of these guidelines has been created for veterinary medicine. The goal of our study was to determine the prevalence of VAP according to the CDC VAP surveillance guidelines, the modified veterinary guidelines, and clinician suspicion. Methods: The medical records at an academic institution were searched for patients mechanically ventilated over 24 h. Results: None of these patients met the CDC VAP surveillance guidelines or the modified guidelines for veterinary medicine. Twelve of 71 cases were concerning for possible VAP based on clinician suspicion. The most common organism grown in both the group with clinician suspected VAP and the group without was Discussion: It is likely that VAP is either over or under diagnosed in this population, as the clinician suspected VAP is based on subjective criteria. Findings suggest that avoiding fluoroquinolones may be beneficial when selecting an empiric antibiotic for cases in which VAP is suspected. Future studies should assess adaptions to the modified VAP surveillance guidelines for veterinary medicine because having guidelines that are too strict could eliminate cases altogether.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.