ArticleCureus2025
Opening the Curtains on Medical Students' Engagement With Ward Rounds: A Qualitative Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Ward rounds are a key component of medical students' clinical training, yet there is inadequate research on students' learning in this setting. Although ward-based learning has been widely studied, research focused specifically on medical students' experience on ward rounds with explicit utilization of educational theory remains limited. The study addressed this gap through its aims of exploring medical students' perspectives and engagement on ward rounds, examining how these may change over time, and considering how students' learning experience could be improved, while drawing explicitly upon work-based learning theory. The overarching research question was: How do medical students engage with ward rounds, and what strategies could enhance their educational experience? Methods Qualitative exploration was carried out at a large UK medical school. Eleven individual semi-structured interviews, each lasting 30-60 minutes, were conducted over Microsoft Teams with students in the final three years of the program. Transcripts underwent inductive thematic analysis, following Braun and Clarke's framework, assisted by NVivo software (QSR International, Melbourne, Australia). Social-cultural learning theories shaped topic guide development and were utilized as sensitizing concepts during analysis. Results This study suggested that students' perspectives on, and educational experience of, ward rounds evolve as they progress through years three to five, revealing a shift from learning from doctors to learning to be doctors and highlighting different views on how learning occurs in the workplace. Students appeared to engage more passively than actively on ward rounds, although this decreased as they advanced toward graduation. Despite recognizing the great educational potential of ward rounds, all students expressed some dissatisfaction, which led them to offer suggestions for improvement. Conclusion Ward rounds remain an underutilized pedagogy with scope for more meaningful student engagement. Enhancing communication and alignment between medical schools, placement providers, doctors, and students, while adopting a socio-cultural approach, could maximize ward round learning and better bridge the university-workplace gap.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.