ReviewCureus2025
The Warburg Effect Redefined: A Kinetic and Regulatory Perspective.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lactate-Mediated Lysine Lactylation in Renal Fibrosis: Current Progress and Challenges.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026Review
- Lactate-to-albumin ratio as an independent predictor of short- and long-term mortality in ICU patients with malignant tumors: A retrospective cohort study.Oncology letters · 2026Article
- Targeting lactylation in hepatocellular carcinoma: Mechanistic insights and therapeutic opportunities (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2026Review
- TPI and GAPDH Interact with Rad9, Linking Glycolytic Enzymes to Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Immunometabolic dysregulation in autoimmune rheumatic diseases: the central role of glycolytic reprogramming in pathogenesis and traditional Chinese medicine therapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Warburg effect, characterized by the preferential conversion of glucose to lactate despite adequate oxygen availability, constitutes a regulated metabolic adaptation rather than a mere dysfunctional response to hypoxia. This metabolic shift arises because lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) exhibits a significantly higher catalytic capacity compared to pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH), resulting in a substantial reduction of pyruvate to lactate once PDH becomes saturated. In cancer cells, this kinetic preference is further amplified by the upregulation of glucose and monocarboxylate transporters (GLUT1, MCT1, and MCT4) and alterations to the plasma membrane, which enhance transport efficiency. These adaptations maintain a high glycolytic flux, facilitate continuous lactate efflux, and circumvent traditional feedback inhibition. The accumulation of glycolytic intermediates supports the biosynthesis of nucleotides, lipids, and proteins, thereby promoting tumorigenesis. Over time, metabolite-induced DNA methylation and chromatin remodeling reinforce this metabolic state, stabilizing the oxygen-independent proliferative phenotype. Consequently, the Warburg effect is best conceptualized as a primary metabolic strategy initiated by membrane remodeling, sustained by kinetic flux imbalances, and perpetuated by epigenetic feedback, collectively enabling tumor growth and survival in adverse microenvironments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.