ArticleCureus2025
Analysis of Medical Liability Lawsuits Involving Cardiologists in Greece.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The analysis of court decisions on medical malpractice can provide a detailed picture of patient mortality and morbidity and the causes that led to medical malpractice. The purpose of our research is to analyze, through published court decisions, cases of alleged medical errors by cardiologists in Greece. This is a retrospective study. Court decisions on medical malpractice by specialists and residents in cardiology from 1990 to 2024 were searched in Greek legal banks. The causes of manslaughter and bodily harm by negligence and the criteria for attributing liability were recorded. Forty-six court cases involving cardiologists were found, including 27 (58.7%) convictions and 19 (41.3%) acquittals - rejections of compensation. Among convictions, 25 (92.59%) involved manslaughter. These decisions concerned 27 patients (11 women and 16 men), with a mean age of 51.82 ± 22.72 years (range 25-84 years). The average compensation amounts imposed were 128.224 ± 71,980 €. In criminal cases, prison sentences ranged from six to 30 months with a three-year suspension. The duration of the legal dispute ranged from three to 20 years (average 5.93 ± 3.35 years). The main causes of manslaughter and bodily harm due to negligence were myocardial infarction (n = 9, 33.33%) and ruptured thoracic and abdominal aortic aneurysm (n = 5, 18.5%). Complications were mainly due to incorrect or delayed diagnosis (n = 17, 62.96%), delayed treatment (n = 14, 51.85%), incorrect treatment (n = 9, 33.33%), and incomplete ordering of diagnostic tests (n = 7, 25.9%). The findings reveal that while cardiology is generally considered a low-risk specialty, when malpractice cases do occur, they are associated with severe outcomes - most notably, a high rate of manslaughter convictions. The most common clinical scenarios leading to legal liability involved acute coronary syndrome and aortic aneurysm rupture, with diagnostic errors, delayed or incorrect treatment, and failure to order necessary tests being the most frequent causes of adverse outcomes. The prolonged duration of litigation and the emotional and financial burden it imposes on both physicians and patients also underline the need for reforms that promote faster resolution and reinforce quality and safety in healthcare delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.