Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41158875›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in molecular biosciences2025

Design and validation of a clinical whole genome sequencing-based assay for patient screening in a large healthcare system.

Josiah T Wagner, John T Welle, Isabelle A Lucas Beckett, Kate R Emery, Benjamin A Cosgrove, Krzysztof Olszewski, Nick Wagner, Tucker C Bower, Li Chi Yuan, Eric M Shull and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in molecular biosciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Josiah T Wagner *Providence Institute for Clinical Innovation, Providence Health, Portland, OR, United States.
John T Welle *Providence Institute for Clinical Innovation, Providence Health, Portland, OR, United States.
Isabelle A Lucas BeckettProvidence Institute for Clinical Innovation, Providence Health, Portland, OR, United States.
Kate R EmeryProvidence Institute for Clinical Innovation, Providence Health, Portland, OR, United States.
Benjamin A CosgroveProvidence Institute for Clinical Innovation, Providence Health, Portland, OR, United States.
Krzysztof OlszewskiFabric Genomics, Oakland, CA, United States.
Nick WagnerProvidence Institute for Clinical Innovation, Providence Health, Portland, OR, United States.
Tucker C BowerProvidence Institute for Clinical Innovation, Providence Health, Portland, OR, United States.
Li Chi YuanProvidence Institute for Clinical Innovation, Providence Health, Portland, OR, United States.
Eric M ShullProvidence Institute for Clinical Innovation, Providence Health, Portland, OR, United States.
Kathleen JadeInstitute For Systems Biology, Seattle, WA, United States.
Jon ClemensProvidence Institute for Clinical Innovation, Providence Health, Portland, OR, United States.
Andrew T MagisInstitute For Systems Biology, Seattle, WA, United States.
Mary B CampbellProvidence Institute for Clinical Innovation, Providence Health, Portland, OR, United States.
Ora K GordonProvidence Institute for Clinical Innovation, Providence Health, Portland, OR, United States.
Carlo B BifulcoProvidence Institute for Clinical Innovation, Providence Health, Portland, OR, United States.
Brian D PieningProvidence Institute for Clinical Innovation, Providence Health, Portland, OR, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Population genetic screening is rapidly emerging as a key methodology in the clinical laboratory for detecting actionable genomic conditions in asymptomatic patients. While current clinical methods are largely focused on targeted gene panels, the increasing efficiency of next-generation sequencing (NGS) platforms permits the use of whole genome sequencing (WGS) for routine clinical applications. The key advantage of WGS is that the complete genome produced by a single sequencing event can form the basis for a patient's genomic health care record for reanalysis throughout a patient's lifetime. Methods: We developed a scalable clinical WGS-based lab developed procedure (LDP) for heritable disease gene testing and pharmacogenomics (PGx). We performed extensive validation across a range of blood, saliva, and reference specimens. Results: The clinical deliverable for the WGS LDP was 78 genes associated with actionable genomic conditions and 4 PGx genes. The validation cohort consisted of samples from 188 study participants that were orthogonally sequenced at commercial reference laboratories and additional reference materials. The WGS LDP demonstrated excellent sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. Conclusion: The deployed LDP was then used to sequence over 2,000 patients as part of a broader clinical implementation study ("Geno4ME"). Our findings support WGS as a viable method for broad clinical screening.

Indexed as

clinical germline testinggenomic medicinelab developed procedurepharmacogenomics (PGx)population screening

Identifiers

PMID41158875
PMCPMC12554564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.