ArticleFrontiers in molecular biosciences2025
Design and validation of a clinical whole genome sequencing-based assay for patient screening in a large healthcare system.
Article in Frontiers in molecular biosciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Population genetic screening is rapidly emerging as a key methodology in the clinical laboratory for detecting actionable genomic conditions in asymptomatic patients. While current clinical methods are largely focused on targeted gene panels, the increasing efficiency of next-generation sequencing (NGS) platforms permits the use of whole genome sequencing (WGS) for routine clinical applications. The key advantage of WGS is that the complete genome produced by a single sequencing event can form the basis for a patient's genomic health care record for reanalysis throughout a patient's lifetime. Methods: We developed a scalable clinical WGS-based lab developed procedure (LDP) for heritable disease gene testing and pharmacogenomics (PGx). We performed extensive validation across a range of blood, saliva, and reference specimens. Results: The clinical deliverable for the WGS LDP was 78 genes associated with actionable genomic conditions and 4 PGx genes. The validation cohort consisted of samples from 188 study participants that were orthogonally sequenced at commercial reference laboratories and additional reference materials. The WGS LDP demonstrated excellent sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. Conclusion: The deployed LDP was then used to sequence over 2,000 patients as part of a broader clinical implementation study ("Geno4ME"). Our findings support WGS as a viable method for broad clinical screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.