ReviewFrontiers in oncology2025
Advances in imaging and artificial intelligence for precision diagnosis and biopsy guidance in prostate cancer.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Decoding Cellular Heterogeneity with Microfluidic Single-Cell Secretion Analysis Tools.ACS omega · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early and accurate diagnosis of prostate cancer is critical for optimizing patient prognosis. However, traditional transrectal ultrasound-guided systematic biopsy (TRUS-Bx) has a relatively high false-negative rate. This is attributed to limitations such as insufficient anatomical coverage and inadequate assessment of tumor heterogeneity. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), when combined with the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS), has substantially improved the diagnostic specificity of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa; Gleason grade ≥ 3 + 4). Nevertheless, its discriminatory ability for PI-RADS 3 lesions remains restricted. In recent years, multimodal image fusion technology has boosted the detection rate of csPCa by 10%-15% via precise lesion localization. Molecular imaging exhibits a sensitivity of up to 95% (range: 90-98%) in the whole-body staging of high-risk patients, particularly for nodal metastases. Artificial intelligence (AI), through deep-learning algorithms, optimizes lesion segmentation and image texture analysis, thereby significantly enhancing the detection rate of csPCa in targeted biopsies. Looking ahead, it is essential to integrate multimodal imaging and genomic data, construct individualized risk-stratification models, and facilitate the clinical translation of low-cost and standardized technologies. This article comprehensively examines the synergistic mechanisms of imaging and AI technologies in the diagnosis and biopsy guidance of prostate cancer, offering a theoretical foundation for precision medicine practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.