ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
The clinical validity of radiomics-based prediction of molecular subtypes in breast cancer from digital mammary tomosynthesis.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To explore the use of digital breast tomography (DBT) imaging omics in developing breast cancer (BC) diagnostic models to identify molecular subtype characteristics of BC. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 433 DBT images. Candidate features were extracted, and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression model was established. Within the training set, machine learning (ML) models were constructed, and their predictive performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and confusion matrixes in the test set, thereby screening the best predictive classifier. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were conducted to obtain key characteristics of nomogram modeling, correction and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate the clinical potential of this model. Results: The LASSO selected 14 features. Random Forest (RF) had the highest AUC value, the highest accuracy, sensitivity, recall rate and F1 score on the training set and test set, and was the best classifier. A nomogram model was established. The odds ratio (OR) of BC patients increased with the increase of the total score. Conclusion: The key features of BC were revealed by image omics and ML models, and a nomogram model with diagnostic value was constructed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.